From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Seymour Subject: Re: git on 64bit windows - state of the art? Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:10:02 +1000 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git Mailing List To: Philippe Vaucher , Erik Faye-Lund X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 19 11:10:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SguRy-0005iv-2h for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 11:10:14 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753176Ab2FSJKF (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:10:05 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:42040 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751002Ab2FSJKD (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 05:10:03 -0400 Received: by weyu7 with SMTP id u7so4249322wey.19 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:10:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hy64AuKkf/W2wnNxNFsj5hjgAzvcz5R/UOLtoeWMW1M=; b=jvXzSAmaO9kI9iFNnyNvoHi6H828NSlUuA75MknZFkWCBle5yDGvsTB6FtTmi2guWH g3+FTC5RktosSjsMCxXnBsOIVhZ8WAgZ6zowzfBZCWKBkwrCkUwrob88LaAsrGhO7Q/Q s1k89TE7VIVVMzRS1JPofGmty7uqe4/1jf0HoyBZSUvVQeMZIBTm7B8YyGRSqQ4n5zyU qIxRPF+fN98YYd+8wdPWgvoDULJlF7rD/eGRfbL9A81n5B266ek83lx7yxKaoC8eSBhw BFOlNkMu0uZFOKcq8/kPd+Ia4EF2uSFL7jEDxkkkquHTp8IaZQTthtwXtrcLXyFNlNAd 1Pow== Received: by 10.216.144.228 with SMTP id n78mr9612387wej.26.1340097002252; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.146.166 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 02:10:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Philippe Vaucher wrote: >> I was wondering what the state of the art for running git on 64 bit Windows is? > > Did they try msysgit? In my experience it has way less issues than cygwin. > > Philippe Erik and Philippe, Thanks for the quick responses. I'll take cygwin out of the picture completely and see if that improves things. I was hoping to use cygwin because I don't like the (understandable) limitations of the msysgit toolset (restricted set of available tools, invoking bat files is painful, symbolic links don't work the same way, etc) jon.