From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Seymour Subject: Re: git on 64bit windows - state of the art? Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:10:45 +1000 Message-ID: References: <4FE0D02B.2040703@obry.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git Mailing List To: pascal@obry.net X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jun 20 04:10:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShANf-0000te-S0 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 04:10:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754043Ab2FTCKr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:10:47 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:63223 "EHLO mail-wg0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753996Ab2FTCKr (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:10:47 -0400 Received: by wgbdr13 with SMTP id dr13so7425622wgb.1 for ; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:10:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Dr32BQpk7Ry7THflOp90HAZEzw2otqV1QQSiDGExJ0s=; b=tG8EVJEjWUxDoTcJtex3CNNHKF7GMxyjwXzxvTddE5NOEQ2jEJYuOff0jgI3moEnqY mNyEcI3iUhDYCVu1k8U4uvqyPIihxu3NrqWp7uK8ktLOQDWMsFwpgdT1Vm3emxVrHpAx ZN9WZznT/xjtZFN4KA3qohoTGvin53iiSBCVPHdCmgy3b/E13Nmamv13MNYmRpKIzVaw ijWrHFOsLPiMver47Q9nsoBikhHiyKi/rZxAYr3Wn3wkdVmbzpoRIdm3R1JUFSt7uyvq elf5hjJ3/hC1VPgY8Oha01ryqPYdMy2arLqcGLldogKRfmVXtF5Y+XaTIzdVTrVftoEa q7ZQ== Received: by 10.216.216.148 with SMTP id g20mr11481264wep.187.1340158245972; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.146.166 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 19:10:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FE0D02B.2040703@obry.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:16 AM, Pascal Obry wrote: > Jon, > > This is a known issue. I have since a long time left Windows world but I > still have some notes to "fix" this: > > From the ash shell (be sure that no Cygwin process are still running): > > $ rebaseall > $ peflagsall > > Try your command again. If it still doesn't work, try instead: > $ rebaseall -b 0x50000000 -o 0x80000 > or -b 0xNNNN0000 where NNNN is any hex number between 2000 and 7000. > The -o option tell to leave more space between the dlls, it may also > help. It did in my case. > > If you are curious, look at /usr/share/doc/Cygwin/rebase-3.0.README > for more explanation. > > > Hope this helps. > > Pascal. Thank you. I think we have tried the -b option without much luck, but I don't think we have tried the -o option. I will arrange to do some testing and will post to the list in a few weeks if this looks to be a definitive solution to the problem (or otherwise) jon.