From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frans Klaver Subject: Re: Question about commit message wrapping Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 08:51:28 +0100 Message-ID: References: <35A5A513-91FD-4EF9-B890-AB3D1550D63F@sidneysm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: git@vger.kernel.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Sidney_San_Mart=C3=ADn?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 09 08:51:38 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RYvF1-0007ti-RG for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 08:51:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751038Ab1LIHva (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:51:30 -0500 Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]:62582 "EHLO mail-qw0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750871Ab1LIHv3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Dec 2011 02:51:29 -0500 Received: by qadb15 with SMTP id b15so2506971qad.19 for ; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:51:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=d67BNPAvVHAgZbsZcAXtgGgSahLQUHfezjaZH+9I8gg=; b=c9KbAs7JNaYLVK2niErmR4xn11shGkc+rhfuFwa8IWEy+XwZUrjzincQxra2ppO96o fMV+NMoHyuB0cMqOAC6v95FJ1/zJiEosUSKiIACc2D//umUkznCLUqm0Lar1uBKEXZ+W ur4wPUacuOa5ME1ukPX7hg2XCMeHRG6rWNQ0Y= Received: by 10.224.52.68 with SMTP id h4mr5933388qag.71.1323417089047; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:51:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.76.82 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:51:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Frans Klaver wrote: >> *Nothing else* in my everyday life works this way anymore. Line wrapping >> gets done on the display end in my email client, my web browser, my ebook >> reader entirely automatically, and it adapts to the size of the window. It appears none of the books I have available here have more than 80 characters on one line. It's a typography thing. And typographers for some reason rarely get it wrong. Why not make use of that knowledge?