git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to force a pull to succeed?
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 23:47:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAH8yC8kVFGe9gnj8P+=Pp1ToDvMPXiViVM-HzhkZ6SAteoPZaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqmvad31sr.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:42 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>>> Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> I scp'd a file to another machine for testing. The change tested OK,
>>>> so I checked it in on the original machine.
>>>> ...
>>>> How do I force the pull to succeed?
>>>
>>> Git doesn't know (or care) if you "scp"ed a file from a known to be
>>> good place, or if you modified it in the editor.  When it notices
>>> that there are differences you may rather not to lose in these files
>>> (because they are different from HEAD), it refrains from touching
>>> them.
>>>
>>> So the way to go forward is for you to make sure that you do not
>>> have such local changes in the repository that your "pull" is trying
>>> to touch.  An easiest way would be to do
>>>
>>>         git checkout HEAD -- <paths>..
>>
>> Thanks. That's an extra command. Is there any way to roll it up into
>> one command?
>
>         git checkout HEAD -- <paths>.. && git pull
>
> ;-)
>
>>> before doing a "git pull" to clear the damage you caused manually
>>> with your "scp".
>>
>> There's no damage. Its expected.
>
> The fact that you think it is expected is immaterial. Git doesn't
> know (or care) how you made the files different from HEAD, so it
> looks like a damage to it.

'git pull' fails and its expected, but 'git pull -f' is supposed to
succeed. That's what -f is supposed to do.

Is there a way to add intelligence to Git so that it sees they are the
_exact_ same file, and it stops bothering me with details of problems
that don't exist?

It seems like adding the intelligence is a good enhancement. A version
control tool has to do three things: check-out, check-in, and
determine differences. Its not doing a good job of determining
differences considering they are the exact same file.

Jeff

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-16  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-16  2:17 How to force a pull to succeed? Jeffrey Walton
2017-05-16  3:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-16  3:32   ` Jeffrey Walton
2017-05-16  3:42     ` Junio C Hamano
2017-05-16  3:47       ` Jeffrey Walton [this message]
2017-05-16  6:59         ` Jeff King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAH8yC8kVFGe9gnj8P+=Pp1ToDvMPXiViVM-HzhkZ6SAteoPZaQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=noloader@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).