From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lex Spoon Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-p4: Use -m when running p4 changes Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:48:29 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Git Users , Pete Wyckoff , Junio C Hamano To: Luke Diamand X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Apr 14 21:48:38 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yi6p1-0000I7-Cv for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 21:48:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754068AbbDNTsb (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:48:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com ([209.85.192.181]:36591 "EHLO mail-pd0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753432AbbDNTsa (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 15:48:30 -0400 Received: by pdea3 with SMTP id a3so23472619pde.3 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+3UdHrfvK8sX+hUdRMalYxXdk7VIJmycWr1J3hGTtF8=; b=gchLVrOwkKOrhQ7sOxoB5Z/r0SAleEIIwKfYESPRD4M5RH8ucIy2tJ1/kEiYS87ybm KdiO4GdIc9PpOWx3rr1l/uzZpxOQDv8v8IfSYC+NQRqGWS8SfuzoE2IdrkfcQrh+/KQr jV4FZK9fyXqIbBPuHZ1kY9EO3QKX1njSWvv24/KkbjpICA9jYrnQZApA3B45eYRU3+qe ciMMx1UMPdMAz9/KQl0ZJuxb4lybilVlgRTjsDrp0q9Gj6hPzGC3gYnqalGcq6hF/SEy CRuF4s41IRlQgoo8CWeSfuZr3UifZ0W+A0UCRuQ2kfrAlotXCqL9AHO5t8baL6pC3fac msgA== X-Received: by 10.68.94.129 with SMTP id dc1mr39324665pbb.8.1429040909757; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.25.132 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 12:48:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Google-Sender-Auth: YOmx1mtWe0l2SuWlqhu3zJ8xG9Q Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: (resending with accidental HTML removed) Great, I'm glad it looks like a good approach! I'll add a test case for it.... and to support the test case, an option for the block size. I guess the block-size option will go on "sync", "clone", and "fetch". Alternatively, maybe someone has a better suggestion of how to configure the block size. Lex Spoon