From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Antoine Pelisse Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Make Git compile warning-free with Clang Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 18:13:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git To: John Keeping X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Feb 03 18:14:10 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U238p-0008Hh-P2 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 18:14:08 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753405Ab3BCRNl (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:13:41 -0500 Received: from mail-qa0-f42.google.com ([209.85.216.42]:50025 "EHLO mail-qa0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753102Ab3BCRNk (ORCPT ); Sun, 3 Feb 2013 12:13:40 -0500 Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id cr7so967418qab.15 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:13:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cDvDcsjcyN7QJCim3Bbdp4pimKPcvnApdBUb0xHP14k=; b=wQl8UILyZXGL6eeT7zlTVwx2KFQrsShv/v06vhdX8LMbb8XB/3myVsjEeeIaBcve7W Abh6QmLFEMaH8BNgxqsg+7ZrfxYxdH/IEatORKyaEdhPfbkMAvXLUBPtVYSa3os/U1px r57HrVdDSQExlZpmd3gWyRjAYSRFJ5Gzmbib24/EY0S9JEgwPlH9QE/2w+qEM+xSvULL r9x+vDICkVzAvnaYfanbsb5OE1QpCbzrxaspwxBTrFqNb28IUEstqaIWQPIrGMwUzcM8 b6EdXoNPfhRplCJgaIAuevNj/3GKvyxaA2Ig/SPTvrfR2xR1a5qAn+aSWuBiygW6aEZh /1IQ== X-Received: by 10.224.34.195 with SMTP id m3mr17253343qad.77.1359911619680; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 09:13:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.13.200 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 09:13:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thanks John, I couldn't find any time to send that "sum-up" series. On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 3:37 PM, John Keeping wrote: > The first two patches here were sent to the list before but seem to have > got lost in the noise [1][2]. The final one is new but was prompted by > discussion in the same thread.