From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ramkumar Ramachandra Subject: Re: [linux.conf.au] VCS Interoperability Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:55:34 +0530 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano , Jonathan Nieder , Dmitry Ivankov To: David Michael Barr X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jan 22 11:26:28 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Roud1-0007yM-7A for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 11:26:27 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751046Ab2AVK0H (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:26:07 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:63366 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751165Ab2AVKZ5 (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:25:57 -0500 Received: by wics10 with SMTP id s10so1463492wic.19 for ; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:25:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=Edp+AdWHJXaWAqC5TbBzWHuEm1VU8ubSLi33WJZmk/c=; b=xhgY80soA+qLAiyP9amTZzUYHLh2c4Q/d0DdsOUHBHic7yCJ/qMBOzBUAd5siU2lqx kTgCncck4p7it1eLirJItewE64V3N64Eh1C/wLYeL6W8XXFEMuGvxHGbZKZ6daES7ORs X74WPumdFZcM5DAexC2r9b1o5BX1N5Pul9+to= Received: by 10.180.109.198 with SMTP id hu6mr7763603wib.16.1327227955279; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.51.202 with HTTP; Sun, 22 Jan 2012 02:25:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi David, David Michael Barr wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, it helped a lot with picking a trajectory. > > Video is now available: http://youtu.be/0hVuv-wv4Dw > Slides: http://barrbrain.github.com/vcs-interoperability.html > > It was my first conference presentation so the usual caveats apply. > I was fortunate to have a small but interested audience. > > I look forward to constructive criticism so that I can better represent > our community to the folk Down Under. Thanks for the valuable criticism. A few thoughts: 1. We'll try to fix this over the next few weeks. 2. Subversion's architecture is well-compartmentalized: is this what leads to communication gaps between the API layers? 3. What are your thoughts on lib'ifying Git so that others can call into it using an API? Cheers!