git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble+github@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Patrick Steinhardt" <ps@pks.im>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Denton Liu" <liu.denton@gmail.com>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"John Cai" <johncai86@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] make stash apply with --index by default
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 10:39:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALnO6CB=2ih-_=VUth=PJZxGkz_GA_mUfWd6gQOFcd36eUpD4A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250510183358.36806-1-ben.knoble+github@gmail.com>

[Apologies for re-send; mis-clicked]

On Sat, May 10, 2025 at 2:34 PM D. Ben Knoble
<ben.knoble+github@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Since git-stash's inception, it has defaulted to stashing the index but not
> restoring it. This has caused some confusion: change the default as part of Git
> 3.0 to unstash the index, too.
>
> I ran into this myself a while back and did some digging; it appears that other
> have been bit, too (see references in patch 3). Moreover, when git-stash was
> originally written, defaulting with --index was suggested but not implemented
> before the script merged. So this RFC should bring us back towards "less
> confusing," hopefully.
>
> The series is structured as follows:
>
> Patches 1-2: unrelated prep/style commits noticed while working on tests.
> Patch 3: update Documentation/BreakingChanges.adoc. This seems like a natural
>     place to discuss the proposal, so it contains no other changes.
> Patch 4: make it so in builtin/stash.c.
> Patches 5-9: update the impacted tests. Separated out for ease of review. I used
>     a style more like "split the test into 2: one with, one without breaking
>     changes." In retrospect, the diff might be smaller (and the 2 versions of
>     the test easier to compare) if I used "test_has_prereq" in the tests… but at
>     the cost of making the tests harder to follow. Thoughts?
>
> D. Ben Knoble (9):
>   t3903: reduce dependencies on previous tests
>   t3905: remove unneeded blank line
>   BreakingChanges: announce stash {apply,pop} will imply --index
>   stash: restore the index by default when breaking changes are enabled
>   t0450: mark stash documentation as a known discrepancy
>   t3903: adjust stash test to account for --[no-]index with breaking
>     changes
>   t3904: adjust stash -p test to account for index states with breaking
>     changes
>   t3905: adjust stash -u tests for breaking changes
>   t3906: adjust stash submodule tests to account for breaking changes
>
>  Documentation/BreakingChanges.adoc |  11 ++
>  Documentation/git-stash.adoc       |   6 ++
>  builtin/stash.c                    |  38 +++++++
>  t/lib-submodule-update.sh          |  24 ++++-
>  t/t0450/adoc-help-mismatches       |   1 +
>  t/t3903-stash.sh                   | 161 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  t/t3904-stash-patch.sh             |  14 ++-
>  t/t3905-stash-include-untracked.sh |  40 ++++++-
>  8 files changed, 276 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: 1ee85f0e215f22b0878d0ad4b2445d12bbb63887
> --
> 2.48.1
>

Any comments from others? CC'd folks from individual patches on cover letter.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-05-20 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-10 18:33 [PATCH 0/9] make stash apply with --index by default D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 1/9] t3903: reduce dependencies on previous tests D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 2/9] t3905: remove unneeded blank line D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 3/9] BreakingChanges: announce stash {apply,pop} will imply --index D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 4/9] stash: restore the index by default when breaking changes are enabled D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 5/9] t0450: mark stash documentation as a known discrepancy D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 6/9] t3903: adjust stash test to account for --[no-]index with breaking changes D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 7/9] t3904: adjust stash -p test to account for index states " D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 8/9] t3905: adjust stash -u tests for " D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-10 18:33 ` [PATCH 9/9] t3906: adjust stash submodule tests to account " D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-12 12:52 ` [PATCH 0/9] make stash apply with --index by default Junio C Hamano
2025-05-20 14:36 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-05-20 14:39 ` D. Ben Knoble [this message]
2025-09-16  0:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Teach git-stash to use --index from config D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  0:37   ` [PATCH v2 1/4] t3903: reduce dependencies on previous tests D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  0:37   ` [PATCH v2 2/4] t3905: remove unneeded blank line D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  0:37   ` [PATCH v2 3/4] stash: refactor private config globals D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  0:37   ` [PATCH v2 4/4] stash: honor stash.index in apply, pop modes D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  9:18     ` Phillip Wood
2025-09-16 17:07       ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16  9:24   ` [PATCH v2 0/4] Teach git-stash to use --index from config Phillip Wood
2025-09-16 17:06     ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-16 16:49   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-22  1:39   ` [PATCH v3 " D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-22  1:39     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] t3903: reduce dependencies on previous tests D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-22  1:39     ` [PATCH v3 2/4] t3905: remove unneeded blank line D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-22  1:39     ` [PATCH v3 3/4] stash: refactor private config globals D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-22  1:39     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] stash: honor stash.index in apply, pop modes D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-22 14:11       ` Phillip Wood
2025-09-24 20:40         ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-09-29 10:01           ` Phillip Wood
2025-10-06 12:59             ` [PATCH] doc: explain the impact of stash.index on --autostash options D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-09 22:54               ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-11 14:44                 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-11 17:28                   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-12 18:04                     ` Ben Knoble

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALnO6CB=2ih-_=VUth=PJZxGkz_GA_mUfWd6gQOFcd36eUpD4A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=ben.knoble+github@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=johncai86@gmail.com \
    --cc=liu.denton@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).