From: "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge/pull: --compact-summary
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 19:26:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALnO6CCrCcEp1FWWWPQ2fts-n-jHZdfYWsyYsG9W5aUV42gs8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqzfefj7j3.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Jun 10, 2025 at 11:12 PM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> "D. Ben Knoble" <ben.knoble@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Does this suggest that we either want a "diff options" option (or
> > config), which would be more general?
>
> If I have bk/new-topic branch, here is how I would merge it.
>
> $ git merge --compact-summary bk/new-topic
>
> but there is an existing merge.stat that (1) is a mere boolean and
> (2) is true by default to force use of "--stat" option. We could
> extend it to "bool or the string 'compact-summary'" and when it is
>
> - not set, do the "--stat" as before;
> - set to true, do the "--stat" as before;
> - set to 'compact-summary', do the "--compact-summary".
>
> With such a configuration variable, "git merge bk/new-topic" would
> be how I would run my merge.
Makes sense; I suppose my question was more along the lines of "should
we go ahead and support extending the options we give to diff more
broadly rather than add a one-off flag (and potentially add more
later)."
--
D. Ben Knoble
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-11 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-08 16:05 [PATCH] merge/pull: --compact-summary Junio C Hamano
2025-06-10 21:16 ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-06-11 3:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-06-11 23:26 ` D. Ben Knoble [this message]
2025-06-11 17:00 ` [PATCH 2/1] merge/pull: extend merge.stat configuration variable to cover --compact-summary Junio C Hamano
2025-06-11 17:12 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-06-11 17:29 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALnO6CCrCcEp1FWWWPQ2fts-n-jHZdfYWsyYsG9W5aUV42gs8Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=ben.knoble@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).