From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Witten Subject: Re: Lack of detached signatures Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:07:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: <7vty7xttxh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Joseph Parmelee , git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Sep 28 02:08:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R8hhS-00029w-33 for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 02:08:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752186Ab1I1AI3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:08:29 -0400 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:52652 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751909Ab1I1AI2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:08:28 -0400 Received: by iaqq3 with SMTP id q3so6266801iaq.19 for ; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:08:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=qGK4mAfxOEtsO+rkqIF/tieJZu4TAhB8DCyuAUnvv8E=; b=D2IX7Sfahj+e7dWuzI0hP1PE+gOeLFuhAYZWa81aGIKdSUP1sSAF4+KZT65PMrLMCY 3ub/TIIY8g+x1AunYpAliA8Ph7vAQ/NoFGVupDOkABEVxdoMp/nPSWhzLCBRKhfAj5s5 VejDrE6QbW+SYxM62pRv34qDWFm2LBLZNH08s= Received: by 10.42.134.4 with SMTP id j4mr10701840ict.135.1317168508084; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:08:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.171.194 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Sep 2011 17:07:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7vty7xttxh.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 00:03, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Joseph Parmelee writes: > >> Under the present circumstances, and particularly considering the >> sensitivity of the git code itself, I would suggest that you implement >> signed detached digital signatures on all release tarballs. > > Well, signed tags are essentially detached signatures. People can verify > tarballs against them if they wanted to, although it is a bit cumbersome. Aren't tarballs used to get git on machines that don't yet have git?