From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: Lack of netiquette, was Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] New remote-hg helper Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 16:58:33 +0100 Message-ID: References: <5090EFCA.7070606@drmicha.warpmail.net> <20121031102712.GB30879@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20121031185903.GA1480@elie.Belkin> <50927D29.3020703@lsrfire.ath.cx> <5093949D.4070509@op5.se> <5093A873.9090701@drmicha.warpmail.net> <5097860E.5040607@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Andreas Ericsson , =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Scharfe?= , Junio C Hamano , Johannes Schindelin , Jonathan Nieder , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org, Sverre Rabbelier , Ilari Liusvaara , Daniel Barkalow To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Nov 05 16:58:52 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TVP4Z-0000BF-Bp for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:58:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751580Ab2KEP6e (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:58:34 -0500 Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:59524 "EHLO mail-ob0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751355Ab2KEP6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:58:33 -0500 Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id uo13so5828241obb.19 for ; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:58:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=C5cIBeTTKStkIZBSx7mDNF8bk0oxwyQO3RUe44m4mDI=; b=W28sAvqlo3lj49vQCF2liSr4Eg29rCLBFo8LeHSBroRoU3/D5Yf1Rf4pu6C/v1r6w5 AZQT0Ne9923Y1j2bPRxeAcwoi9kftkOnhNWyyNDmOP7gegf1irCul5+PWrqNIE9I1/tU WQEc84v4kHRdXpe2bcHWoAH0WumjEd/Z+L46yUuHytY7Z0qs5YQJBcNM/fe6lZT2FkXb Gha95o0kQNeO9oWXG0rVdQYaR6lZigoXIlXd+qF0fw5lcTX5ZtCd4C0DAsHuc/7X3om0 3zQobwbS7ocrms4Bp5WjJQAEHncmarwpV5JorDCXC1+XDU154ECf1PEgqsrOqAoYt1JT sRUw== Received: by 10.182.245.20 with SMTP id xk20mr8166357obc.89.1352131113087; Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.4.74 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:58:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Felipe Contreras wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Michael J Gruber > wrote: >> For one thing, contributors on the kernel list are open to technical >> arguments, and that includes the arguments of others; just like we are >> here. On the other hand, you seem to rebuke "any" (most) technical >> argument in harsh words as if it were a personal attack; at least that's >> how your answers come across to me (and apparently others). That really >> makes it difficult for most of us here to argue with you technically, >> which is a pity. That lack of openness for the arguments of others would >> make your life difficult on the kernel list also. ... > If that's not the case, show me a single instance when I rebuke > technical arguments in *harsh* words... perhaps, you think any > rebuking is "harsh". Specifically, show me an instance were *I* was > harsh, and the reviewer was not. > > If you cannot show instances of this, then your statement that I > rebuke harshly doesn't stand; I rebuke, that's all. In addition to this, I'm still waiting for an answer of what's wrong with the words that started this thread: On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Felipe Contreras wrote: > It doesn't get any more obvious than that. But to each his own. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras