From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: 'git merge tag' not working as before Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 20:06:15 +0200 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 To: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed May 30 20:06:53 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SZnIK-0002IW-0m for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Wed, 30 May 2012 20:06:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757322Ab2E3SGS (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 14:06:18 -0400 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:56040 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757311Ab2E3SGR (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 May 2012 14:06:17 -0400 Received: by lahd3 with SMTP id d3so77755lah.19 for ; Wed, 30 May 2012 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PKFOtej8zJp12BT7pZgBqugXMFMZXBo9T2FLEMO2ojs=; b=cH9tsrEKcg29IJs/+qWsHoXPbyYa8D8VhRjNzqgIyttv29ZSPMAxHZ6ymnOSQrY13q j8GC1rUGKk6x78dFqLMesIAGZIPLN2LuCWynApoiVLmBaakh34ZlsNJFR+whP4KcWRzw 5PLkyP08YylMgqaS0IkRvmr6kr8IT81f8hy/GH+ejXNtkCOIa7SyzmqS7lgXJpftA/O+ s+Yz875wRPC+MEbtvcqWmmAhcXSybn4A++CFgvQLNxkUQ4YXwTKVH8DA+6flXzxGOPIg xhTBB1f0ccIAqEBCmzIOff9EbdBKHXE44zxXnkMTlGt9Y4m99jhh2v/it6Zf79mXXOM7 fZXQ== Received: by 10.152.112.138 with SMTP id iq10mr16679936lab.13.1338401175703; Wed, 30 May 2012 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.107.65 with HTTP; Wed, 30 May 2012 11:06:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, I used to do things like 'git merge v1.7.10.3' (from v1.7.10.2) but even though it's ff it tries to create a merge commit. Seems like now I have to run 'git merge v1.7.10.3^0', I don't see why that would be desirable. I think this is a bug and a regression. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras