Re: [PATCH] Add project-wide .vimrc configuration

[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 2:13 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> *2* In other words, I doubt these graphs are depicting "how widely
> >> is an editor used by developers".  It is just showing how often it
> >> is installed, and I know the primary workstation I use daily has vim
> >> and nano installed without me choosing to have them, as opposed to
> >> emacs I had to manually install, and I only use vim once every month
> >> and nano once every quarter.
> >
> > Yes, but in Arch Linux at least no editor is installed by default.
>
> I thought everybody has nano not because it is adequate and usable
> for them, but because it comes by default with distros, and distro
> in turn choose nano not because it is particularly popular but is
> small enough not to matter if left behind unused when the user
> chooses a real editor.
>
> But you are essentially usaying that 80% of Arch users install nano
> by choice.  I find it doubly surprising.

I double checked. The installation instructions [1] do tell you to
pick an editor, and they don't suggest any.

I am half-surprised. The StackOverflow question "How do I exit the Vim
editor?" has 2.2 million views [2], there's countless memes about that
ordeal [3], and the SO team even found it wise to write a blog post
about it [4]. I don't know how to exit emacs (Ctrl-X Ctrl-e?), and I
suspect many emacs users don't know how to exit vim.

Nano doesn't have this problem. Which means for somebody entering the
world of Linux, that's a plus.

Cheers.

[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Installation_guide#Install_essential_packages
[2] https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11828270/how-do-i-exit-the-vim-editor
[3] https://twitter.com/iamdevloper/status/993821761648103425
[4] https://stackoverflow.blog/2017/05/23/stack-overflow-helping-one-million-developers-exit-vim/


--
Felipe Contreras