From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/20] remote-bzr: split marks file Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 23:57:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1366938488-25425-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1366938488-25425-13-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <7v4nesvncw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7v1u9usdag.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Apr 29 06:57:40 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UWg9i-0008JA-KM for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 06:57:38 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753277Ab3D2E5Y (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:57:24 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:51778 "EHLO mail-la0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753184Ab3D2E5X (ORCPT ); Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:57:23 -0400 Received: by mail-la0-f49.google.com with SMTP id fp13so2775966lab.8 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:57:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=eQ7fL7LbPkP9FVraByRK6/lxknCzFYnxHLirXHMrt5U=; b=wp+QcXWX8ReJ2nRGeFaqmH3vvAKmznGg2V5vZ8ttlja9JlKyrEp5PxIgO9k5Imso9C KNBDejVS5HDit2e1IzXnxewrZ5c3viwP1B66L4d8PMtjkiIyX3b4bEuzK0ekpXVLzJ6W Rv+h9c2AwdAETcbeFZj1FO8zMenwCp8xtFoK//M+I/aidamNi/Y4KHuStaU1ndkBFXCj 6eXTjNLbZCwRZWCkVNL6APwALprtB/UoZjkAZo9GQTyKR1UTMAVxFScFAsw3eS4WTB1W jFd6pMhNFBYARIj4AHk+eScDmOU7YcjO/jhYEe/wtV5bL5ayzVJ/YMtyAIRE+aXBt5sw 736w== X-Received: by 10.152.20.134 with SMTP id n6mr14669921lae.19.1367211441879; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.83.167 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:57:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7v1u9usdag.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 1:47 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> Felipe Contreras writes: >> >>> And in case anybody is thinking that remote-bzr is really a too fast >>> moving target; even if this managed to land in 'master', it's likely >>> that people were not able to push at all, and in fact, many were not >>> even able to clone in 1.8.2. So, hardly could be considered a >>> regression. Nevertheless, I caught it in time. >> >> You didn't. I am already way too deep into today's 1.8.3-rc0 >> integration cycle and I won't waste a couple of hours work just to >> revert this. > > Oh, I was lucky ;-) I mistook this with the other 9-patch bzr > clean-up series that I applied to 'master' for -rc0. > > Pushing out a tagged-tip takes a lot longer than the normal tip > because a lot more than what people see have to happen on my end. > > Reverting a single patch is simple, but we do not want to do that on > top of "Git 1.8.3-rc0" commit and move the unpublished tag to point > at the revert. > > Which means pretty much everything needs to be redone (one example > among many is that the tagname will propagate to the htmldocs and > manpages repositories, so their unpublished histories need to be > rewound). > > But I didn't have to do that in the end ;-) Yeah, I realized you were talking about that one later on. I haven't heard anything bad from this new branch from emacs developers, so I think it's OK to merge it. Cheers. -- Felipe Contreras