Re: [PATCH v4 09/14] remote-testgit: report success after an import

[Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Stefano Lattarini
<stefano.lattarini@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/02/2012 03:02 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Doesn't make a difference for the tests, but it does for the ones
>> seeking reference.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  git-remote-testgit | 11 +++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-remote-testgit b/git-remote-testgit
>> index 6c348b0..4e8b356 100755
>> --- a/git-remote-testgit
>> +++ b/git-remote-testgit
>> @@ -59,7 +59,18 @@ while read line; do
>>              sed -e "s#refs/heads/#${prefix}/heads/#g"
>>          ;;
>>      export)
>> +        declare -A before after
>> +
> If you convert this script to be a valid POSIX shell script (as I've
> suggested in my reply to [PATCH v4 04/14]), you'll need to get rid of
> this bashism (and those below) as well.

Yeah, but I don't want to. I originally used transitory files, and
used esoteric options of diff to do the same (which were probably not
portable).

In the end I liked this approach much better.

If you have a solution for this that works in POSIX shell, I'll be
glad to consider it, but for the moment, I think a simple, easy to
understand and maintain code is more important, and if it needs bash,
so be it.

>> +        eval $(git for-each-ref --format='before[%(refname)]=%(objectname)')
>> +
>>          git fast-import --{import,export}-marks="$testgitmarks" --quiet
>> +
>> +        eval $(git for-each-ref --format='after[%(refname)]=%(objectname)')
>> +
>> +        for ref in "${!after[@]}"; do
>> +            test "${before[$ref]}" ==  "${after[$ref]}" && continue
>> +            echo "ok $ref"
>> +        done
>>          echo
>>          ;;
>>      '')

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras