From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] add: avoid yoda conditions Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 13:56:35 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1383211547-9145-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1383211547-9145-17-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: git To: Martin von Zweigbergk X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 31 20:56:42 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbyMD-0008Qo-Pp for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 20:56:42 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755202Ab3JaT4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:56:37 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]:62698 "EHLO mail-lb0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753605Ab3JaT4h (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:56:37 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x18so2828056lbi.12 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LzVgim2TkAvTseJpQC62z8Ig4KUcuZdTzIWjfORrDME=; b=Ofh9IJpcIPdFGQirb2+/fUuTNQvejAikcVeA8Q6XzIn6unNbRoMTaFZoiB0PlMWwLd rJIXXfs5MTcUHUL0aeoADOEZXsCoYtaIDhtQM+ZErJiUD1TynSaO3kYMwYI0Giu+q6/i GgZKl/s51dYY6n2IJ5n5Hd58twD63IpVG2dGGbXMeT8C4I5WKvYHWYPlx44q7Ici601t CX8vY+o0qapc729E1+WYBsLuQEulyP14aePDbpP6uqnxajLWaoXGCZtZ0V3aI4UqyWd0 FFK64Dw8riZTQjqkWPlbjtdR3b1NsJX0XpYFDe61zIJnWSsjM355ahdYUgmSELV3AVDu P74Q== X-Received: by 10.152.180.139 with SMTP id do11mr3078554lac.23.1383249395799; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.201.69 with HTTP; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 12:56:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:48 PM, Martin von Zweigbergk wrote: > I guess what I'm trying to say is that either we accept them and get > used to reading them without being surprised, or we can change a bit > more than one at a time perhaps? I understand that this was an > occurrence you just happened to run into, and I'm not saying that a > patch has to deal with _all_ occurrences. I'm more just wondering if > we want mention our position, whatever it is, in CodingGuidelines. Yes, I'm all in favor of updating CodingGuidelines with that. -- Felipe Contreras