From: Ralf Thielow <ralf.thielow@gmail.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr>,
Nazri Ramliy <ayiehere@gmail.com>,
Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0: Comment in rebase instruction has become too rigid
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 20:31:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN0XMOJDUMHX5WwVYoJVSuYKPHpf=+0Os=U34_zRDt1XPwPtQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqk2r99jjp.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>
2015-09-29 20:17 GMT+02:00 Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>:
> Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
>
>>> Confirmed: Git 2.1.4 accepts this, 2.6 doesn't:
>>>
>>> Warning: the command isn't recognized in the following line:
>>> - # pick dbafac11052a0075233bdcf0b71f54d1503aa82d test
>>>
>>> You can fix this with 'git rebase --edit-todo'.
>>> Or you can abort the rebase with 'git rebase --abort'.
>>>
>>> I didn't bisect, but I guess this was introduced in the series
>>> introducing this check on the todolist before starting the bisection.
>>
>> Indeed:
>>
>> 804098bb30a5339cccb0be981a3e876245aa0ae5 is the first bad commit
>
> Yup, before that series, expand_todo_ids -> transfom_todo_ids ended
> up reading each line with "while read -r command rest" loop and the
> we did not honor the usual "# at the beginning line is the comment"
> convention, which I think was a bug. With that commit, a separate
> step in check_bad_cmd_and_sha1 uses a similar looking "while read"
> loop but forgets to take '#' into account.
>
> I know you alluded to preprocess what is fed to stripspace, but I
> wonder if we can remove the misguided call to stripspace in the
> first place and do something like the attached instead.
>
> git-rebase--interactive.sh | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-rebase--interactive.sh b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> index f01637b..a64f77a 100644
> --- a/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> +++ b/git-rebase--interactive.sh
> @@ -886,7 +886,6 @@ check_commit_sha () {
> # from the todolist in stdin
> check_bad_cmd_and_sha () {
> retval=0
> - git stripspace --strip-comments |
> (
> while read -r line
> do
> @@ -896,7 +895,7 @@ check_bad_cmd_and_sha () {
> sha1=$2
>
> case $command in
> - ''|noop|x|"exec")
> + '#'*|''|noop|x|"exec")
If so, I think we should use "$comment_char"* here.
> # Doesn't expect a SHA-1
> ;;
> pick|p|drop|d|reword|r|edit|e|squash|s|fixup|f)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 18:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-29 14:02 2.6.0: Comment in rebase instruction has become too rigid Nazri Ramliy
2015-09-29 15:05 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-09-29 17:01 ` Matthieu Moy
2015-09-29 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-29 18:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-09-29 18:31 ` Ralf Thielow [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAN0XMOJDUMHX5WwVYoJVSuYKPHpf=+0Os=U34_zRDt1XPwPtQQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=ralf.thielow@gmail.com \
--cc=Matthieu.Moy@grenoble-inp.fr \
--cc=ayiehere@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).