git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Uma Srinivasan <usrinivasan@twitter.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>,
	Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@gmail.com>,
	Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de>,
	Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net>
Subject: Re: git submodules implementation question
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:56:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAN5XQft1YFEdxcB8Q_qFG4iYmSaSX_JXDCESzeEyYqPO0BUbaw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa8frwhpr.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

>>> The final version needs to be accompanied with tests to show the
>>> effect of this change for callers.  A test would set up a top-level
>>> and submodule, deliberately break submodule/.git/ repository and
>>> show what breaks and how without this change.

Agreed!

The repo where the original problem surfaced is huge and in fact "git
status" appears to go into an infinite loop forking a zillion
processes on the system. If the dev system is small, it brings it to a
standstill. However, the good news is that I could build myself a
smaller reproducer by doing the following:

1) mkdir sm_test
2) cd sm_test
3) git clone git://git.mysociety.org/commonlib commonlib
4) git init
5) git submodule add ./commonlib/
6) cd commonlib/.git
7) rm -f all files

After this "git status" will fork several thousand processes but it
will ultimately fail as it runs into the path length max limit. I
still don't know why this doesn't happen with my original problem
repo. Perhaps I have to let it run overnight or perhaps it runs into
other system limitations before then....

Anyway, with the fix "git status" fails quickly both in my reproducer
(and original repo) with the following message.....
fatal: Not a git repository: '.git'
fatal: 'git status --porcelain' failed in submodule commonlib

Hope this helps.

Uma


On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> writes:
>
>>> The final version needs to be accompanied with tests to show the
>>> effect of this change for callers.  A test would set up a top-level
>>> and submodule, deliberately break submodule/.git/ repository and
>>> show what breaks and how without this change.
>>
>> Tests are really good at providing this context as well, or to communicate
>> the actual underlying problem, which is not quite clear to me.
>> That is why I refrained from jumping into the discussion as I think the
>> first few emails were dropped from the mailing list and I am missing context.
>
> I do not know where you started reading, but the gist of it is that
> submodule.c spawns subprocess to run in the submodule's context by
> assuming that chdir'ing into the <path> of the submodule and running
> it (i.e. cp.dir set to <path> to drive start_command(&cp)) is
> sufficient.  When <path>/.git (either it is a directory itself or it
> points at a directory in .git/module/<name> in the superproject) is
> a corrupt repository, running "git -C <path> command" would try to
> auto-detect the repository, because it thinks <path>/.git is not a
> repository and it thinks it is not at the top-level of the working
> tree, and instead finds the repository of the top-level, which is
> almost never what we want.
>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-01 21:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-28 23:24 git submodules implementation question Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-29 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-29 21:03   ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-29 21:09     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-29 21:13       ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-29 23:04         ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-29 23:15           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-29 23:34             ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-30  0:02             ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-30  0:12               ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-30  6:09                 ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-30  6:23                   ` Jacob Keller
2016-08-30 17:40                     ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-30 17:53                       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-31  2:54                         ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-31 16:42                           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-31 18:40                             ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-08-31 18:44                               ` Junio C Hamano
2016-08-31 18:58                                 ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-09-01  1:04                                   ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-09-01  4:09                             ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 16:05                               ` Uma Srinivasan
2016-09-01 18:32                                 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 18:37                                   ` Stefan Beller
2016-09-01 19:19                                     ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 19:56                                       ` Uma Srinivasan [this message]
2016-09-01 20:29                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 20:21                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 21:02                                         ` Junio C Hamano
2016-09-01 21:04                                         ` Stefan Beller
2016-09-01 21:12                                           ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAN5XQft1YFEdxcB8Q_qFG4iYmSaSX_JXDCESzeEyYqPO0BUbaw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=usrinivasan@twitter.com \
    --cc=Jens.Lehmann@web.de \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hvoigt@hvoigt.net \
    --cc=jacob.keller@gmail.com \
    --cc=sbeller@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).