Re: Keep original author with git merge --squash?

[David Glasser <glasser@davidglasser.net>]

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:21:04AM -0800, David Glasser wrote:
>>
>>> (I'm not sure if this should be a flag to --squash or to commit.
>>> Maybe `git merge --squash`; `git commit --use-squashed-author`?  Seems
>>> like it should be not too hard to implement; SQUASH_MSG is pretty
>>> parseable.  Or just a config value.)
>>
>> It sounds like "git commit -c" is close to what you want, which will
>> pull the author and commit message from a particular commit. But I don't
>> think there is a convenient way to name the commit in your case (it is
>> likely to be the first commit on the branch you are squash-merging, but
>> there isn't a shorthand for that).
>
> I thought David was primarily interested in the case where a branch
> authored by a single person, so specifying the tip of the branch
> being "merged" would be sufficient, no?

Well, using -c appears to override SQUASH_MSG entirely; it replaces
the message as well as the author.  Often I do want to make my own
message based on all the messages provided by the submitter.  (And
typically the branch's tip is the least useful message anyway: it's
usually something like "respond to code review".)

--dave


-- 
glasser@davidglasser.net | langtonlabs.org | flickr.com/photos/glasser/