From: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: "Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
"Neeraj K. Singh" <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:46:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANQDOddgwc4X2snAGvoz0KFaCWcx+k2U3qfoLywcUS=6yF=Htg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya9LPOseu8geBi4v@ncase>
On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:54 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:46:50AM +0000, Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
> > index c23d01de7dc..c32534c13b4 100644
> > --- a/builtin/index-pack.c
> > +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
> > @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static void conclude_pack(int fix_thin_pack, const char *curr_pack, unsigned cha
> > nr_objects - nr_objects_initial);
> > stop_progress_msg(&progress, msg.buf);
> > strbuf_release(&msg);
> > - finalize_hashfile(f, tail_hash, 0);
> > + finalize_hashfile(f, tail_hash, FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK, 0);
> > hashcpy(read_hash, pack_hash);
> > fixup_pack_header_footer(output_fd, pack_hash,
> > curr_pack, nr_objects,
> > @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ static void final(const char *final_pack_name, const char *curr_pack_name,
> > if (!from_stdin) {
> > close(input_fd);
> > } else {
> > - fsync_or_die(output_fd, curr_pack_name);
> > + fsync_component_or_die(FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK, output_fd, curr_pack_name);
> > err = close(output_fd);
> > if (err)
> > die_errno(_("error while closing pack file"));
> > diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > index 857be7826f3..916c55d6ce9 100644
> > --- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > +++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > @@ -1204,11 +1204,13 @@ static void write_pack_file(void)
> > * If so, rewrite it like in fast-import
> > */
> > if (pack_to_stdout) {
> > - finalize_hashfile(f, hash, CSUM_HASH_IN_STREAM | CSUM_CLOSE);
> > + finalize_hashfile(f, hash, FSYNC_COMPONENT_NONE,
> > + CSUM_HASH_IN_STREAM | CSUM_CLOSE);
>
> It doesn't have any effect here given that we don't sync at all when
> writing to stdout, but I wonder whether we should set up the component
> correctly regardless of that such that it makes for a less confusing
> read.
>
If it's not actually a file with some name known to git, is it really
a component of the repository? I'd like to leave this one as-is.
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> > index c3410b8a868..29c867aab03 100644
> > --- a/config.c
> > +++ b/config.c
> > @@ -1213,6 +1213,73 @@ static int git_parse_maybe_bool_text(const char *value)
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > +static const struct fsync_component_entry {
> > + const char *name;
> > + enum fsync_component component_bits;
> > +} fsync_component_table[] = {
> > + { "loose-object", FSYNC_COMPONENT_LOOSE_OBJECT },
> > + { "pack", FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK },
> > + { "pack-metadata", FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK_METADATA },
> > + { "commit-graph", FSYNC_COMPONENT_COMMIT_GRAPH },
> > + { "objects", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_OBJECTS },
> > + { "default", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_DEFAULT },
> > + { "all", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_ALL },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static enum fsync_component parse_fsync_components(const char *var, const char *string)
> > +{
> > + enum fsync_component output = 0;
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp(string, "none"))
> > + return output;
> > +
> > + while (string) {
> > + int i;
> > + size_t len;
> > + const char *ep;
> > + int negated = 0;
> > + int found = 0;
> > +
> > + string = string + strspn(string, ", \t\n\r");
> > + ep = strchrnul(string, ',');
> > + len = ep - string;
> > +
> > + if (*string == '-') {
> > + negated = 1;
> > + string++;
> > + len--;
> > + if (!len)
> > + warning(_("invalid value for variable %s"), var);
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!len)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fsync_component_table); ++i) {
> > + const struct fsync_component_entry *entry = &fsync_component_table[i];
> > +
> > + if (strncmp(entry->name, string, len))
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + found = 1;
> > + if (negated)
> > + output &= ~entry->component_bits;
> > + else
> > + output |= entry->component_bits;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!found) {
> > + char *component = xstrndup(string, len);
> > + warning(_("unknown %s value '%s'"), var, component);
> > + free(component);
> > + }
> > +
> > + string = ep;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return output;
> > +}
> > +
> > int git_parse_maybe_bool(const char *value)
> > {
> > int v = git_parse_maybe_bool_text(value);
> > @@ -1490,6 +1557,13 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsync")) {
> > + if (!value)
> > + return config_error_nonbool(var);
> > + fsync_components = parse_fsync_components(var, value);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsyncmethod")) {
> > if (!value)
> > return config_error_nonbool(var);
> > @@ -1503,7 +1577,7 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> > }
> >
> > if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsyncobjectfiles")) {
> > - fsync_object_files = git_config_bool(var, value);
> > + warning(_("core.fsyncobjectfiles is deprecated; use core.fsync instead"));
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Shouldn't we continue to support this for now such that users can
> migrate from the old, deprecated value first before we start to ignore
> it?
>
> Patrick
>
That's a good question and one I was hoping to answer through this
discussion. I'm guessing that most users do not have this setting
explicitly set, and it's largely a non-functional change. Git only
behaves differently in the extreme corner case of a system crash after
git exits. That's why I believe it's okay to deprecate and remove in
one release.
If we choose to keep supporting the setting, it would introduce a
little complexity in the configuration code, but it should be doable.
I think the right semantics would be to ignore core.fsyncobjectfiles
if core.fsync is specified with any value. Otherwise,
core.fsyncobjectfiles would be equivalent to `default,-loose-object`
or `default,loose-object` for `false` and `true` respectively. I'd
prefer not to do this if I can get away with it :).
Thanks,
Neeraj
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-07 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-04 3:28 [PATCH 0/2] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsync: add writeout-only mode for fsyncing repo data Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-06 7:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-04 3:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 12:14 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:29 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:18 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:58 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 20:46 ` Neeraj Singh [this message]
2021-12-07 12:29 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 21:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-08 10:05 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 0:14 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-09 4:08 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09 6:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-18 23:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-19 15:28 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-19 14:52 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-28 1:28 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 2:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:56 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-08 0:44 ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09 0:57 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08 1:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj Singh
2022-01-09 0:55 ` rsbecker
2022-01-10 19:00 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-02 0:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-02 1:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 21:18 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 23:04 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 23:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-12 0:39 ` rsbecker
2022-02-14 7:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-02-14 17:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:42 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-09 18:50 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 20:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 12:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 20:05 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 20:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01 3:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] wrapper: move inclusion of CSPRNG headers the wrapper.c file Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 1:21 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 1:26 ` brian m. carlson
2022-03-10 1:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 0:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 2:53 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 7:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:38 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 18:44 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 20:25 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 21:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 13:11 ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-10 17:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 9:53 ` Future-proofed syncing of refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 6/8] core.fsync: add `fsync_component()` wrapper which doesn't die Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:40 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 7/8] core.fsync: new option to harden loose references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:25 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:54 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 6:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-11 9:36 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-10 9:53 ` [PATCH 8/8] core.fsync: new option to harden packed references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] wrapper: make inclusion of Windows csprng header tightly scoped Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control infrastructure Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] core.fsync: add configuration parsing Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-28 11:06 ` Jiang Xin
2022-03-28 19:45 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-15 19:12 ` [PATCH v7] " Neeraj Singh
2022-03-15 19:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-15 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-23 14:20 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 21:24 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 0:24 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-26 1:23 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? Junio C Hamano
2022-03-26 1:25 ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 15:31 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-27 5:27 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-27 12:43 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 10:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-28 11:25 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 19:56 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-30 16:59 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 23:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 0:03 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 18:50 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-13 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11 9:58 ` [PATCH v2] core.fsync: new option to harden references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-25 6:11 ` SZEDER Gábor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANQDOddgwc4X2snAGvoz0KFaCWcx+k2U3qfoLywcUS=6yF=Htg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=nksingh85@gmail.com \
--cc=avarab@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=neerajsi@microsoft.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).