git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neeraj Singh <nksingh85@gmail.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: "Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
	"Git List" <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>,
	"Bagas Sanjaya" <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	"Elijah Newren" <newren@gmail.com>,
	"Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason" <avarab@gmail.com>,
	"Neeraj K. Singh" <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2021 12:46:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANQDOddgwc4X2snAGvoz0KFaCWcx+k2U3qfoLywcUS=6yF=Htg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ya9LPOseu8geBi4v@ncase>

On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 3:54 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2021 at 02:46:50AM +0000, Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > From: Neeraj Singh <neerajsi@microsoft.com>
> [snip]
> > diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
> > index c23d01de7dc..c32534c13b4 100644
> > --- a/builtin/index-pack.c
> > +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
> > @@ -1286,7 +1286,7 @@ static void conclude_pack(int fix_thin_pack, const char *curr_pack, unsigned cha
> >                           nr_objects - nr_objects_initial);
> >               stop_progress_msg(&progress, msg.buf);
> >               strbuf_release(&msg);
> > -             finalize_hashfile(f, tail_hash, 0);
> > +             finalize_hashfile(f, tail_hash, FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK, 0);
> >               hashcpy(read_hash, pack_hash);
> >               fixup_pack_header_footer(output_fd, pack_hash,
> >                                        curr_pack, nr_objects,
> > @@ -1508,7 +1508,7 @@ static void final(const char *final_pack_name, const char *curr_pack_name,
> >       if (!from_stdin) {
> >               close(input_fd);
> >       } else {
> > -             fsync_or_die(output_fd, curr_pack_name);
> > +             fsync_component_or_die(FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK, output_fd, curr_pack_name);
> >               err = close(output_fd);
> >               if (err)
> >                       die_errno(_("error while closing pack file"));
> > diff --git a/builtin/pack-objects.c b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > index 857be7826f3..916c55d6ce9 100644
> > --- a/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > +++ b/builtin/pack-objects.c
> > @@ -1204,11 +1204,13 @@ static void write_pack_file(void)
> >                * If so, rewrite it like in fast-import
> >                */
> >               if (pack_to_stdout) {
> > -                     finalize_hashfile(f, hash, CSUM_HASH_IN_STREAM | CSUM_CLOSE);
> > +                     finalize_hashfile(f, hash, FSYNC_COMPONENT_NONE,
> > +                                       CSUM_HASH_IN_STREAM | CSUM_CLOSE);
>
> It doesn't have any effect here given that we don't sync at all when
> writing to stdout, but I wonder whether we should set up the component
> correctly regardless of that such that it makes for a less confusing
> read.
>

If it's not actually a file with some name known to git, is it really
a component of the repository? I'd like to leave this one as-is.

> [snip]
> > diff --git a/config.c b/config.c
> > index c3410b8a868..29c867aab03 100644
> > --- a/config.c
> > +++ b/config.c
> > @@ -1213,6 +1213,73 @@ static int git_parse_maybe_bool_text(const char *value)
> >       return -1;
> >  }
> >
> > +static const struct fsync_component_entry {
> > +     const char *name;
> > +     enum fsync_component component_bits;
> > +} fsync_component_table[] = {
> > +     { "loose-object", FSYNC_COMPONENT_LOOSE_OBJECT },
> > +     { "pack", FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK },
> > +     { "pack-metadata", FSYNC_COMPONENT_PACK_METADATA },
> > +     { "commit-graph", FSYNC_COMPONENT_COMMIT_GRAPH },
> > +     { "objects", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_OBJECTS },
> > +     { "default", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_DEFAULT },
> > +     { "all", FSYNC_COMPONENTS_ALL },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static enum fsync_component parse_fsync_components(const char *var, const char *string)
> > +{
> > +     enum fsync_component output = 0;
> > +
> > +     if (!strcmp(string, "none"))
> > +             return output;
> > +
> > +     while (string) {
> > +             int i;
> > +             size_t len;
> > +             const char *ep;
> > +             int negated = 0;
> > +             int found = 0;
> > +
> > +             string = string + strspn(string, ", \t\n\r");
> > +             ep = strchrnul(string, ',');
> > +             len = ep - string;
> > +
> > +             if (*string == '-') {
> > +                     negated = 1;
> > +                     string++;
> > +                     len--;
> > +                     if (!len)
> > +                             warning(_("invalid value for variable %s"), var);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (!len)
> > +                     break;
> > +
> > +             for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fsync_component_table); ++i) {
> > +                     const struct fsync_component_entry *entry = &fsync_component_table[i];
> > +
> > +                     if (strncmp(entry->name, string, len))
> > +                             continue;
> > +
> > +                     found = 1;
> > +                     if (negated)
> > +                             output &= ~entry->component_bits;
> > +                     else
> > +                             output |= entry->component_bits;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             if (!found) {
> > +                     char *component = xstrndup(string, len);
> > +                     warning(_("unknown %s value '%s'"), var, component);
> > +                     free(component);
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             string = ep;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return output;
> > +}
> > +
> >  int git_parse_maybe_bool(const char *value)
> >  {
> >       int v = git_parse_maybe_bool_text(value);
> > @@ -1490,6 +1557,13 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> >               return 0;
> >       }
> >
> > +     if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsync")) {
> > +             if (!value)
> > +                     return config_error_nonbool(var);
> > +             fsync_components = parse_fsync_components(var, value);
> > +             return 0;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsyncmethod")) {
> >               if (!value)
> >                       return config_error_nonbool(var);
> > @@ -1503,7 +1577,7 @@ static int git_default_core_config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
> >       }
> >
> >       if (!strcmp(var, "core.fsyncobjectfiles")) {
> > -             fsync_object_files = git_config_bool(var, value);
> > +             warning(_("core.fsyncobjectfiles is deprecated; use core.fsync instead"));
> >               return 0;
> >       }
>
> Shouldn't we continue to support this for now such that users can
> migrate from the old, deprecated value first before we start to ignore
> it?
>
> Patrick
>

That's a good question and one I was hoping to answer through this
discussion.  I'm guessing that most users do not have this setting
explicitly set, and it's largely a non-functional change. Git only
behaves differently in the extreme corner case of a system crash after
git exits.  That's why I believe it's okay to deprecate and remove in
one release.

If we choose to keep supporting the setting, it would introduce a
little complexity in the configuration code, but it should be doable.
I think the right semantics would be to ignore core.fsyncobjectfiles
if core.fsync is specified with any value. Otherwise,
core.fsyncobjectfiles would be equivalent to `default,-loose-object`
or `default,loose-object` for `false` and `true` respectively. I'd
prefer not to do this if I can get away with it :).

Thanks,
Neeraj

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-07 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 122+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-04  3:28 [PATCH 0/2] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-04  3:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] fsync: add writeout-only mode for fsyncing repo data Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-06  7:54   ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-04  3:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07  2:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07  2:46   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:44     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 12:14       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:29       ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07 12:18     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 23:58       ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07  2:46   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:53     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-07 20:46       ` Neeraj Singh [this message]
2021-12-07 12:29     ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-07 21:44       ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-08 10:05         ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09  0:14           ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09  0:44             ` Junio C Hamano
2021-12-09  4:08             ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2021-12-09  6:18               ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-18 23:50                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-01-19 15:28                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-19 14:52                 ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-01-28  1:28                   ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-07  2:46   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-07 11:56   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Patrick Steinhardt
2021-12-08  0:44     ` Neeraj Singh
2021-12-09  0:57   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  0:57     ` [PATCH v3 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  0:57     ` [PATCH v3 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  0:57     ` [PATCH v3 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2021-12-09  0:57     ` [PATCH v3 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-01-08  1:13     ` [PATCH v3 0/4] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj Singh
2022-01-09  0:55       ` rsbecker
2022-01-10 19:00         ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01  3:33     ` [PATCH v4 " Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01  3:33       ` [PATCH v4 1/4] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01  3:33       ` [PATCH v4 2/4] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-02  0:51         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-02  1:42           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 21:18             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 22:19               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-11 23:04                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 23:15                   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-02-12  0:39                     ` rsbecker
2022-02-14  7:04                     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-02-14 17:17                       ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 13:42                         ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-09 18:50                           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-09 20:03                           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 12:33                             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:15                               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 20:05                           ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-11 20:38           ` Neeraj Singh
2022-02-01  3:33       ` [PATCH v4 3/4] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-02-01  3:33       ` [PATCH v4 4/4] core.fsync: add a `derived-metadata` aggregate option Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03       ` [PATCH v5 0/5] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03         ` [PATCH v5 1/5] wrapper: move inclusion of CSPRNG headers the wrapper.c file Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10  1:21             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10  1:26           ` brian m. carlson
2022-03-10  1:56             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-09 23:03         ` [PATCH v5 2/5] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:48           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03         ` [PATCH v5 3/5] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10  0:21           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10  2:53             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10  7:19               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:38                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 18:44                   ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:57                     ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 20:25                       ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 21:17                         ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 13:11               ` Johannes Schindelin
2022-03-10 17:18               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-09 23:03         ` [PATCH v5 4/5] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-09 23:03         ` [PATCH v5 5/5] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10  9:53         ` Future-proofed syncing of refs Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10  9:53         ` [PATCH 6/8] core.fsync: add `fsync_component()` wrapper which doesn't die Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 17:34           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 18:40             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10  9:53         ` [PATCH 7/8] core.fsync: new option to harden loose references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:25           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-10 19:03             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:54           ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11  6:40           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11  9:15             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-11  9:36               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-10  9:53         ` [PATCH 8/8] core.fsync: new option to harden packed references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 18:28           ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11  9:10             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-10 22:43         ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Neeraj K. Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 1/6] wrapper: make inclusion of Windows csprng header tightly scoped Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 2/6] core.fsyncmethod: add writeout-only mode Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 3/6] core.fsync: introduce granular fsync control infrastructure Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 4/6] core.fsync: add configuration parsing Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-28 11:06             ` Jiang Xin
2022-03-28 19:45               ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 5/6] core.fsync: new option to harden the index Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-10 22:43           ` [PATCH v6 6/6] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options Neeraj Singh via GitGitGadget
2022-03-15 19:12             ` [PATCH v7] " Neeraj Singh
2022-03-15 19:32               ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-15 19:56                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-23 14:20               ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-25 21:24                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26  0:24                   ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-26  1:23                     ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? Junio C Hamano
2022-03-26  1:25                     ` do we have too much fsync() configuration in 'next'? (was: [PATCH v7] core.fsync: documentation and user-friendly aggregate options) Neeraj Singh
2022-03-26 15:31                       ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-27  5:27                         ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-27 12:43                           ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 10:56                             ` Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-28 11:25                               ` Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
2022-03-28 19:56                                 ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-30 16:59                                   ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-10 23:34           ` [PATCH v6 0/6] A design for future-proofing fsync() configuration Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11  0:03             ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-11 18:50               ` Neeraj Singh
2022-03-13 23:50             ` Junio C Hamano
2022-03-11  9:58           ` [PATCH v2] core.fsync: new option to harden references Patrick Steinhardt
2022-03-25  6:11             ` SZEDER Gábor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANQDOddgwc4X2snAGvoz0KFaCWcx+k2U3qfoLywcUS=6yF=Htg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=nksingh85@gmail.com \
    --cc=avarab@gmail.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=neerajsi@microsoft.com \
    --cc=newren@gmail.com \
    --cc=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).