git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>
To: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@endocode.com>
Cc: git <git@vger.kernel.org>, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gitweb: Add a feature for adding more branch refs
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:06:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANQwDwe+a2P0Jxqw0k7sHWv3exdb4k+NU3jL3ogR-rcetd82TQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386164583-14109-5-git-send-email-krzesimir@endocode.com>

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@endocode.com> wrote:
>
> Allow extra-branch-refs feature to tell gitweb to show refs from
> additional hierarchies in addition to branches in the list-of-branches
> view.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzesimir Nowak <krzesimir@endocode.com>
> Reviewed-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com>

This version is Helped-by (maybe), but not (yet!) Reviewed-by.

> ---
>  Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>  gitweb/gitweb.perl            | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt b/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> index e2113d9..5a77452 100644
> --- a/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/gitweb.conf.txt
> @@ -849,6 +849,43 @@ time zones in the form of "+/-HHMM", such as "+0200".
>  +
>  Project specific override is not supported.
>
> +extra-branch-refs::
> +       List of additional directories under "refs" which are going to
> +       be used as branch refs. For example if you have a gerrit setup
> +       where all branches under refs/heads/ are official,
> +       push-after-review ones and branches under refs/sandbox/,
> +       refs/wip and refs/other are user ones where permissions are
> +       much wider, then you might want to set this variable as
> +       follows:
> ++
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +$feature{'extra-branch-refs'}{'default'} =
> +       ['sandbox', 'wip', 'other'];
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ++
> +If overriding was enabled then this feature can be configured on a

s/was/is/;

Perhaps it would better read as

    This feature can be configured on per-repository basis after setting
    $feature{'extra-branch-refs'}{'override'} to true, via repository's
    `gitweb.extraBranchRefs` ...

> +per-repository basis via repository's `gitweb.extrabranchrefs`
> +configuration variable, which contains a space separated list of
> +refs. An example:
> ++
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +[gitweb]
> +       extrabranchrefs = sandbox wip other
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

O.K.

> ++
> +The gitweb.extrabranchrefs is actually a multi-valued configuration
> +variable, so following example is also correct and the result is the
> +same as of the snippet above:
> ++
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> +[gitweb]
> +       extrabranchrefs = sandbox
> +       extrabranchrefs = wip other
> +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this part should be better left for a separate patch. There is
important difference between single-valued and multi-valued configuration
variable: with single-valued later occurrences override earlier ones,
which includes settings in more specific config file (e.g. per-repository)
overriding setting in more general one (e.g. per-user or system-wide).

With multi-valued we won't be able to override earlier / more generic
settings... well, unless we add support for no-value, or empty-value
as clearer, i.e.

  [gitweb]
           extrabranchrefs = sandbox
           extrabranchrefs
 # or    extrabranchrefs =
           extrabranchrefs = wip other

resulting in ('wip', 'other').

> ++
> +It is an error to specify a ref that does not pass "git check-ref-format"
> +scrutiny. Duplicated values are filtered.
> +

Hmmm... 'snapshot' feature ignores invalid values, but in this case
formerly valid compression schemes might get invalid via tightening
%known_snapshot_formats, and we don't want existing config getting
suddenly invalid.

[cut]

Nice!

-- 
Jakub Narebski

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-04 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-04 13:42 [PATCH 0/5] Show extra branch refs in gitweb v6 Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 13:42 ` [PATCH 1/5] gitweb: Add a comment explaining the meaning of $/ Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 15:11   ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-04 15:46     ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 16:19       ` Martin Langhoff
2013-12-04 20:28         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-05  9:16           ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 17:34       ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-04 17:37         ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-04 13:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] gitweb: Move check-ref-format code into separate function Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 15:56   ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-05  9:19     ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 20:31   ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-05  9:18     ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 13:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] gitweb: Return plain booleans in validation methods Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 16:07   ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-04 18:11     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-05  9:23     ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-05 18:16       ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-05 19:11         ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-05 20:01           ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-04 13:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] gitweb: Add a feature for adding more branch refs Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 18:06   ` Jakub Narębski [this message]
2013-12-05 10:00     ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-05 11:40       ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-10 16:04       ` Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-10 18:54     ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-10 19:06       ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-10 19:44         ` Junio C Hamano
2013-12-04 13:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] gitweb: Denote non-heads, non-remotes branches Krzesimir Nowak
2013-12-04 18:54   ` Jakub Narębski
2013-12-04 20:37 ` [PATCH 0/5] Show extra branch refs in gitweb v6 Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANQwDwe+a2P0Jxqw0k7sHWv3exdb4k+NU3jL3ogR-rcetd82TQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jnareb@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=krzesimir@endocode.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).