From: Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "Eric Sunshine" <ericsunshine@charter.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, "Rubén Justo" <rjusto@gmail.com>,
"Eric Sunshine" <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] check-non-portable-shell: improve `VAR=val shell-func` detection
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 14:35:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO_smVhd_fWkC1=9r_ASCEPoM_rRap3DAWq--nq+6dQ8M8qzjQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq34o1cn6b.fsf@gitster.g>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 11:10 AM Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> writes:
>
> > Is there an example of a shell on Linux that has this behavior that I
> > can observe, and/or reproduction steps?
>
> Every once in a while this comes up and we fix, e.g.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/528CE716.8060307@ramsay1.demon.co.uk/
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/c6efda03848abc00cf8bf8d84fc34ef0d652b64c.1264151435.git.mhagger@alum.mit.edu/
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/Koa4iojOlOQ_YENPwWXKt7G8Aa1x6UaBnFFtliKdZmpcrrqOBhY7NQ@cipher.nrlssc.navy.mil/
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180713055205.32351-2-sunshine@sunshineco.com/
Thanks, this one leads to
https://lore.kernel.org/git/20180713055205.32351-1-sunshine@sunshineco.com/,
which references
https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqefg8w73c.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/T/,
which claims that `dash` has this behavior 6 years ago. The version of
`dash` I have on my machine right now doesn't seem to have this issue,
but I can believe some older version does.
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/574E27A4.6040804@ramsayjones.plus.com/
>
> which is from a query
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/?q=one-shot+export+shell+function
>
> but unfortunately we do not document which exact shell the observed
> breakage happened with.
>
> The closest article I found that is suitable as a discussion
> reignitor talks about what POSIX requires, which may be more
> relevant:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/git/4B5027B8.2090507@viscovery.net/
This claims that `ksh` "gets it right", and I can confirm that ksh
does behave this way on my Linux machine.
Having just looked at the POSIX standard (I don't think I'm allowed to
copy from this document), the POSIX standard (POSIX.1-2024, at least)
explicitly leaves it unspecified whether the variable assignments
remain in effect after function execution.
Thanks for indulging my curiosity; should we include a statement in
the linter along the lines of `# POSIX.1-2024 explicitly does not
specify if variable assignment persists after executing a shell
function; some shells, such as ksh, have these variables remain.`?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-22 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 6:59 [PATCH 0/4] improve one-shot variable detection with shell function Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] t3430: modernize one-shot "VAR=val shell-func" invocation Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 15:09 ` Phillip Wood
2024-07-23 9:26 ` Phillip Wood
2024-07-26 6:33 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 6:15 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 18:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-07-26 6:30 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 6:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] t4034: fix use of one-shot variable assignment with shell function Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 6:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] check-non-portable-shell: improve `VAR=val shell-func` detection Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 14:46 ` Rubén Justo
2024-07-26 6:45 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 13:15 ` Rubén Justo
2024-07-22 17:26 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-07-22 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-07-22 21:35 ` Kyle Lippincott [this message]
2024-07-22 21:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-07-22 6:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] check-non-portable-shell: suggest alternative for `VAR=val shell-func` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-22 14:47 ` Rubén Justo
2024-07-22 14:50 ` [PATCH 0/4] improve one-shot variable detection with shell function Rubén Justo
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] " Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] t3430: drop unnecessary one-shot "VAR=val shell-func" invocation Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 18:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-07-26 19:32 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] t4034: fix use of one-shot variable assignment with shell function Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] check-non-portable-shell: loosen one-shot assignment error message Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] check-non-portable-shell: suggest alternative for `VAR=val shell-func` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 13:11 ` Rubén Justo
2024-07-26 19:31 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 8:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] check-non-portable-shell: improve `VAR=val shell-func` detection Eric Sunshine
2024-07-26 18:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] improve one-shot variable detection with shell function Junio C Hamano
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 " Eric Sunshine
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] t3430: drop unnecessary one-shot "VAR=val shell-func" invocation Eric Sunshine
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] t4034: fix use of one-shot variable assignment with shell function Eric Sunshine
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] check-non-portable-shell: loosen one-shot assignment error message Eric Sunshine
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] check-non-portable-shell: suggest alternative for `VAR=val shell-func` Eric Sunshine
2024-07-27 5:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] check-non-portable-shell: improve `VAR=val shell-func` detection Eric Sunshine
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAO_smVhd_fWkC1=9r_ASCEPoM_rRap3DAWq--nq+6dQ8M8qzjQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=spectral@google.com \
--cc=ericsunshine@charter.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rjusto@gmail.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).