From: Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] set errno=0 before strtoX calls
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2024 23:15:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAO_smViSG27KrtE7hgq1GAzUYSoKFgrQymRYg-aKJqm4UW9DUg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZqxqtIJi4-xBL9Sj@tanuki>
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 10:12 PM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2024 at 04:10:51AM +0000, Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > From: Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com>
> >
> > To detect conversion failure after calls to functions like `strtod`, one
> > can check `errno == ERANGE`. These functions are not guaranteed to set
> > `errno` to `0` on successful conversion, however. Manual manipulation of
> > `errno` can likely be avoided by checking that the output pointer
> > differs from the input pointer, but that's not how other locations, such
> > as parse.c:139, handle this issue; they set errno to 0 prior to
> > executing the function.
> >
> > For every place I could find a strtoX function with an ERANGE check
> > following it, set `errno = 0;` prior to executing the conversion
> > function.
>
> Makes sense. I've also gone through callsites and couldn't spot any
> additional ones that are broken.
>
> Generally speaking, the interfaces provided by the `strtod()` family of
> functions is just plain awful, and ideally we wouldn't be using them in
> the Git codebase at all without a wrapper. We already do have wrappers
> for a subset of those functions, e.g. `strtol_i()`, which use an out
> pointer to store the result and indicate success via the return value
> instead of via `errno`.
>
> It would be great if we could extend those wrappers to cover all of the
> integer types, convert our code base to use them, and then extend our
> "banned.h" banner. I'm of course not asking you to do that in this patch
> series.
>
> Out of curiosity, why do you hit those errors in your test setup? Do you
> use a special libc that behaves differently than the most common ones?
The second patch in this series fixes the original reason I noticed
the issues in three of the files: our remote test execution service
uses paths that are >128 bytes long, so the getcwd call in
strbuf_getcwd was returning ERANGE once, and then it remained set
since getcwd didn't clear it on success. ref-filter.c was found via
searching, I think that was during the search for `ERANGE`.
>
> Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-08-02 6:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-08-02 4:10 [PATCH 0/3] Small fixes for issues detected during internal CI runs Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 4:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] set errno=0 before strtoX calls Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 5:12 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-08-02 6:15 ` Kyle Lippincott [this message]
2024-08-02 15:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 4:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] strbuf: set errno to 0 after strbuf_getcwd Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 15:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 17:56 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-08-02 4:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] t6421: fix test to work when repo dir contains d0 Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 15:13 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Small fixes for issues detected during internal CI runs Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] set errno=0 before strtoX calls Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 21:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] strbuf: set errno to 0 after strbuf_getcwd Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 21:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-02 21:54 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-08-05 15:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-06 6:26 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-08-06 7:04 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-08-02 23:51 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-08-05 17:12 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-08-02 20:58 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] t6421: fix test to work when repo dir contains d0 Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-02 21:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-03 0:03 ` Kyle Lippincott
2024-08-03 0:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-08-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Small fixes for issues detected during internal CI runs Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] set errno=0 before strtoX calls Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-05 17:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] t6421: fix test to work when repo dir contains d0 Kyle Lippincott via GitGitGadget
2024-08-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Small fixes for issues detected during internal CI runs Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAO_smViSG27KrtE7hgq1GAzUYSoKFgrQymRYg-aKJqm4UW9DUg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=spectral@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).