From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7343EC47082 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 06:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BCA61380 for ; Sat, 5 Jun 2021 06:45:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229924AbhFEGrm (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 02:47:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34834 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229660AbhFEGrm (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Jun 2021 02:47:42 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBF7C061766 for ; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 23:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id g20so17922087ejt.0 for ; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 23:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oLdftnGh9+UwGYSzkqGUaqry7yi423eH2MX5IdcTD6U=; b=Z61cTzZBGG2hw8z+ZKolcM5F6CBjq8XIm/owka5e9DGQxu8iNFdMGO9v929k3XxJVN QHxFQFViUClkY8+erq1R9Kiq14OAtEgIZ4LDdxKEQXyRuLnSyN2bQ5aMZS4MBY5/dFRa Cd7viaYeEb0jHxxkGLY98iRjA+2lg1mTIuZZCxF5D7niLHh+VeUyj02S+qgOQjnwsabZ Ho7dENqHkHrtqasY9vRqTgiuicLJGDDwae0TjVUnUGDeZtqA9w69WIpZX6ldinmLDBHj KEk4CfypQQGEkXJW8T2D7mrBYPLwTGzevgrj6CQBy/BP+A3YmMnl408hzUvTLwmtHHky jj7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oLdftnGh9+UwGYSzkqGUaqry7yi423eH2MX5IdcTD6U=; b=nnrolJJyB/TqYoY12eRzj6f8sa9kMrb6b2LJxIVkwQw9HgwRK56or2zkGgctZlLq20 klzcYgzj1xQGBTsSr4oQe/r9TAGfeI6eXI44IStagEQrFDpWuKjpBcUdpbOluR5Hjj5K FLhGfRsDvGMGqW16v6WL4zc7Qo6PrgdupXWHdPXtCXVv1U9gSKf5LceEmQfVJIevAcJX DZVYjEQDayOzsT3U0pHmtxhYICuliuuAK+77vCgyw5sFhWrqK6eoWJhhWrVh8egxtGUb q2frYmJ14uSo2+wLGCsmT5UU6x1k/N66dAxkxvFlQq67ScN9TiPKN7vf4ugPAW+esnNO qM8g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533GXDcO/TPRtFQUNZZgm5oBTqQrZ+acBfC4z5HkTtLtK8DDW01J AzhyEcOJvilckGxH3afa1Akv2gQdnrtQ3HBJEVo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyI+u7rHaBt5e+yVLWQJQmyoNv7MsJ45P7Hb8NRBNJqHjin1E2ZIUb8iChIq5AsCQqPknHF1zO4fdrqRcY02uY= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:2a8c:: with SMTP id fl12mr7821272ejc.160.1622875538628; Fri, 04 Jun 2021 23:45:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Christian Couder Date: Sat, 5 Jun 2021 08:45:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] [GSOC] ref-filter: add %(raw) atom To: ZheNing Hu Cc: ZheNing Hu via GitGitGadget , git , Junio C Hamano , Hariom Verma , Karthik Nayak , Felipe Contreras , Bagas Sanjaya , Jeff King , Phillip Wood Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jun 5, 2021 at 7:42 AM ZheNing Hu wrote: > I want to mention another question: > If I have a new patch series about %(rest) is based on the current %(raw) > patch series, should I submit it immediately? Yeah, I think it's ok to send it as long as you explicitly specify (using a link for example) the patch series on the mailing list it depends on.