Re: Draft of Git Rev News edition 18

[Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Jakub Narębski <jnareb@gmail.com> wrote:
> W dniu 14.08.2016 o 23:10, Philip Oakley pisze:
>> From: "Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> A draft of a new Git Rev News edition is available here:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/git/git.github.io/blob/master/rev_news/drafts/edition-18.md
>>>
>>> Everyone is welcome to contribute in any section either by editing the
>>> above page on GitHub and sending a pull request, or by commenting on
>>> this GitHub issue:
>>>
>>>  https://github.com/git/git.github.io/issues/170
>>>
>>> You can also reply to this email.
>>
>> I see you mention in passing (well in the small headings near the bottom)
>> that gmane web interface has gone away. It may be worth noting a few of
>> the alternatives, and in particular Eric's newly updated public-inbox
>> https://public-inbox.org/git/.
>
> It would be nice to turn it into mini-story rather than just putting
> a link.

Yeah, it would be also very welcome if someone could send a patch or a
pull request for a mini-story about it.

> Additional references / information:
>
> * "Alternatives to mid.gmane.org?" thread, starting with
>   Message-Id: <481D1EE2-6A66-418F-AB28-95947BBF3680@gmail.com>
>
>   Mentions a few alternatives besides public-inbox:
>
>      https://marc.info/?i=%s
>      https://mid.mail-archive.com/%s
>      https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/%s
>
>   for finding message based on Message-Id
>
>   NOTE: there are a few mailing list archive sites not mentioned
>   in this thread, like Nabble, some of them listed on (not updated)
>   https://git.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/GitCommunity
>
> * "Ingebrigtsen: The End of Gmane?" short note / article on LWN.net,
>   https://lwn.net/Articles/695695/ [Posted July 28, 2016 by jake],
>   part of "Announcements" (http://lwn.net/Articles/695980/) section
>   of LWN.net Weekly Edition for August 4, 2016
>   (http://lwn.net/Articles/695974/)

Thanks for this. Maybe you could just add those in a pull request or a
patch to the "Git tools and sites" sub section just after the item
about public-inbox?

Thanks anyway!