From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0209C4338F for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 06:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3567610FB for ; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 06:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231200AbhHGGM6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 02:12:58 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41074 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229495AbhHGGM6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 7 Aug 2021 02:12:58 -0400 Received: from mail-vk1-xa33.google.com (mail-vk1-xa33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42C24C0613CF for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 23:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa33.google.com with SMTP id q3so2601899vkd.2 for ; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 23:12:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=1voMxoQa98ioLP/md+Qqpxzsefa33odabF5rTPnj5qE=; b=lpWPUtE+OKJZPJzAdjL8L5d/6BoDM3hrn6y+nlSS3xTyMwErYDjV3FgrnFhKua+x1T tKAS4jZxfDMGonIBNanvzl1BOodP76NJLYvAOnQaDZbdOPg9AwJ2qusnA75u7x0zWYCd FydAHd0qe/C3OGtzaguI03h58AX0ntjBWJYCtgrFGUyxIK1nqZQyKfvS+6Awo/AVnEJ4 b7mgyw5nKIV4MAwM2au+mqxcHuWYSBnVWy/MHwN5MvMXuCwxIe0xK9Lsue5qmt6onOSq kP/u5rnXChRaB+kfDDrWC1+XS8Lnigi7wDaHrNpXJpvlw6BmNHFkyBB85QQ4SomijHZK m9AQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1voMxoQa98ioLP/md+Qqpxzsefa33odabF5rTPnj5qE=; b=UDKQiTiKhpKyU1sPo/opDIEvH4H7wyMLFqLotBzT1zdw++qIwyuRGAL6V17zPz8Hpe sSGXlSEp+o8HLNrlUeykO6LQgpUywt61pdZttZbfKWvJ72Tq6Ei8JjssSBBBSl8RLcXw 6MoBaLspxqO0etVzYeJgrFgUy8ovyZEh3v6yzNPJ//Zw9ElhJ3xQlNABZP1An6BFiSYp lTmfYcCEjDX2iBgcmFHStApM7S7C68Ea98WPZH0Nc3QW6x8RgMxfsSEdeH6l+cIZgQdV 50Rev+b6iOrA2L31Wy/7sz9fILEi7TWdXIPkllGGs2Q4TAh9jq/gye80SPRGawNACtuk i5vQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531pCypCuyr0PQQsjrusVcWDWkHOqKeRxoOpJtHUVTzEe+o/W9DF IfCd2vuq5CRezh3wxn2FbJkdTeL/iAWtKCVGcqI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy63p2OGe6qAoQXRu8KXAwdGn5fDVWfQl3Xg2UCaGdJj2HrO9K+g+2UAB0+1L1rXB9gHF71DyXeg8dI3xGcTVg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:2209:: with SMTP id bb9mr10029980vkb.10.1628316759185; Fri, 06 Aug 2021 23:12:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Carlo Arenas Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 23:12:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with Git's Spanish translation To: Alex Henrie Cc: Git mailing list , git-l10n@googlegroups.com, Jiang Xin , =?UTF-8?Q?Christopher_D=C3=ADaz?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org your last version has over 5K changes and from those almost 10% seem to be missing from the original, so my guess would be this is indeed not something that could be reviewed in time for the next release (currently in rc1) AS-IS. Before I gave up, I noticed there were indeed some where the original text was too mangled to be readable, so maybe focus on those first to make the patch more easy to digest and to get those fixes for the release. Some of the other ones might be added on top as independent commits grouped in common cases (ex: the ones adding/removing spaces, or the ones where a specific term has been renamed) so the full list is more manageable IMHO, and might even get enough reviews to be included sooner than later. Carlo PS. for example one of the first changes does ("aplicar stash" -> "hacer stash") for "stash" which make more sense than the direct translation "esconder" in this context, especially considering the command is called "stash" anyway, but that seem more of a personal preference and definitely could wait, unlike others. having that (and similar changes) on its own patch allows for a discussion and prioritization without holding the more important changes.