From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org>
Cc: Lex Spoon <lex@lexspoon.org>, Git Mailing List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size handling
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 15:32:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPc5daUFM+46tdPPmRTRu17UvDbyCGrhx_BDEnSepBMgS2r4ag@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5575E264.6040601@diamand.org>
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Luke Diamand <luke@diamand.org> wrote:
> On 08/06/15 18:18, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>
>> Lex Spoon <lex@lexspoon.org> writes:
>>
>>> Precisely, Junio, that's what I had in mind. The patch with the two
>>> lines deleted LGTM.
>>
>>
>> Thanks, will do.
>
>
> I don't think we're quite there yet unfortunately.
>
> The current version of git-p4 will let you do things like:
>
> $ git p4 clone //depot@1,2015/05/31
>
> i.e. get all the revisions between revision 1 and the end of last month.
>
> Because my change tries to batch up the revisions, it fails when presented
> with this.
>
> There aren't any test cases for this, but it's documented (briefly) in the
> manual page.
>
> I think that although the current code looks really nice and clean, it's
> going to have to pick up a bit more complexity to handle non-numerical
> revisions. I don't think it's possible to do batching at the same time.
>
> It shouldn't be too hard though; I'll look at it later this week.
[jch: adding git@ back]
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-07 10:21 [PATCHv1 0/3] git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size support Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 10:21 ` [PATCHv1 1/3] git-p4: additional testing of --changes-block-size Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 16:06 ` Lex Spoon
2015-06-07 10:21 ` [PATCHv1 2/3] git-p4: test with limited p4 server results Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 16:11 ` Lex Spoon
2015-06-07 10:21 ` [PATCHv1 3/3] git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size handling Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 16:33 ` Lex Spoon
2015-06-07 17:06 ` Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 21:35 ` [PATCHv2 0/3] " Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 21:35 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] git-p4: additional testing of --changes-block-size Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 21:35 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] git-p4: test with limited p4 server results Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 21:35 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size handling Luke Diamand
2015-06-07 22:58 ` Lex Spoon
2015-06-08 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-06-08 16:36 ` Lex Spoon
[not found] ` <xmqqy4juazkz.fsf@gitster.dls.corp.google.com>
[not found] ` <5575E264.6040601@diamand.org>
2015-06-08 22:32 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2015-06-07 16:01 ` [PATCHv1 0/3] git-p4: fixing --changes-block-size support Lex Spoon
2015-06-07 16:58 ` Luke Diamand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPc5daUFM+46tdPPmRTRu17UvDbyCGrhx_BDEnSepBMgS2r4ag@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lex@lexspoon.org \
--cc=luke@diamand.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).