From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [GSoC][MICRO] Forbid "log --graph --no-walk"
Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2015 04:56:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQDAurk2WeTNZPVTnQ8GJSQOpWyDxHNCK_ww25ZdLtFwQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425632110-31863-1-git-send-email-dongcan.jiang@gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com> wrote:
> Forbid "log --graph --no-walk
Style: drop capitalization in the Subject: line. Also prefix with the
command or module being modified, followed by a colon. So:
log: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
or:
revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk
> Because --graph is about connected history while --no-walk is about discrete points.
Okay. You might also want to cite the wider discussion[1].
[1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/216083
> revision.c: Judge whether --graph and --no-walk come together when running git-log.
> buildin/log.c: Set git-log cmd flag.
> Documentation/rev-list-options.txt: Add specification on the forbidden usage.
No need to repeat in prose what the patch itself states more clearly
and concisely.
Also, such a change should be accompanied by new test(s).
> Signed-off-by: Dongcan Jiang <dongcan.jiang@gmail.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> index 4ed8587..eea2c0a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/rev-list-options.txt
> @@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ endif::git-rev-list[]
> given on the command line. Otherwise (if `sorted` or no argument
> was given), the commits are shown in reverse chronological order
> by commit time.
> + Cannot be combined with `--graph` when running git-log.
>
> --do-walk::
> Overrides a previous `--no-walk`.
> @@ -781,6 +782,7 @@ you would get an output like this:
> on the left hand side of the output. This may cause extra lines
> to be printed in between commits, in order for the graph history
> to be drawn properly.
> + Cannot be combined with `--no-walk` when running git-log.
Nice to see documentation updates. More below.
> This enables parent rewriting, see 'History Simplification' below.
> +
> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> index dd8f3fc..7bf5adb 100644
> --- a/builtin/log.c
> +++ b/builtin/log.c
> @@ -627,6 +627,7 @@ int cmd_log(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> git_config(git_log_config, NULL);
>
> init_revisions(&rev, prefix);
> + rev.cmd_is_log = 1;
> rev.always_show_header = 1;
> memset(&opt, 0, sizeof(opt));
> opt.def = "HEAD";
> diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
> index 66520c6..5f62c89 100644
> --- a/revision.c
> +++ b/revision.c
> @@ -1399,6 +1399,8 @@ void init_revisions(struct rev_info *revs, const char *prefix)
>
> revs->commit_format = CMIT_FMT_DEFAULT;
>
> + revs->cmd_is_log = 0;
> +
> init_grep_defaults();
> grep_init(&revs->grep_filter, prefix);
> revs->grep_filter.status_only = 1;
> @@ -2339,6 +2341,8 @@ int setup_revisions(int argc, const char **argv, struct rev_info *revs, struct s
>
> if (revs->reflog_info && revs->graph)
> die("cannot combine --walk-reflogs with --graph");
> + if (revs->no_walk && revs->graph && revs->cmd_is_log)
Placing 'revs->cmd_is_log' first would make it clear at a glance that
this restriction impacts 'log' only (but see question below):
if (revs->cmd_is_log && revs->no_walk && revs->graph)
> + die("cannot combine --no-walk with --graph when running git-log");
> if (!revs->reflog_info && revs->grep_filter.use_reflog_filter)
> die("cannot use --grep-reflog without --walk-reflogs");
>
> diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
> index 0ea8b4e..255982a 100644
> --- a/revision.h
> +++ b/revision.h
> @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ struct rev_info {
> track_first_time:1,
> linear:1;
>
> + /* cmd type */
> + unsigned int cmd_is_log:1;
Genuine question: Despite the GSoC micro-project mentioning only
'log', is it ever meaningful for these two options to be specified
together? I suspect not, but it would be nice to hear from someone
more familiar with the issue. If not specific to 'log', then the patch
can be simplified a good deal.
> enum date_mode date_mode;
>
> unsigned int abbrev;
> --
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-06 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-06 8:55 [PATCH] [GSoC][MICRO] Forbid "log --graph --no-walk" Dongcan Jiang
2015-03-06 9:56 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2015-03-06 13:13 ` Dongcan Jiang
2015-03-06 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-06 10:07 ` René Scharfe
2015-03-07 4:56 ` [PATCH v2/GSoC/MICRO] revision: forbid combining --graph and --no-walk Dongcan Jiang
2015-03-08 19:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-09 4:09 ` [PATCH v3/GSoC/MICRO] " Dongcan Jiang
2015-03-10 21:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-11 2:13 ` [PATCH v4/GSoC/MICRO] " Dongcan Jiang
2015-03-17 23:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2015-03-17 23:24 ` Eric Sunshine
2015-03-18 5:34 ` [PATCH v5/GSoC/MICRO] " Dongcan Jiang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cQDAurk2WeTNZPVTnQ8GJSQOpWyDxHNCK_ww25ZdLtFwQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=dongcan.jiang@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).