From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
Cc: Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/6] builtin/verify-tag: replace name argument with sha1
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:56:36 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cQ_R+YJVAsDDDPBHRZ=Un=34kum096YeFrGOo3_pU-g3A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459872449-7537-5-git-send-email-santiago@nyu.edu>
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 12:07 PM, <santiago@nyu.edu> wrote:
> builtin/verify-tag: replace name argument with sha1
builtin/verify-tag: prepare verify_tag() for libification
> This change is meant to prepare verify_tag for libification. Many
> existing modules/commands already do the refname to sha1 resolution, so
> should avoid resolving the refname twice.
If I hadn't already understood the purpose of the patch, I think I'd
still be somewhat clueless after reading this because it doesn't do a
thorough job of explaining what the actual problem is that this is
solving. Perhaps something like this might be better:
verify_tag() accepts a tag name which it resolves to a SHA1
before verification, however, the plan is to make this
functionality public and it is possible that future callers will
already have a SHA1 in hand. Since it would be wasteful for them
to supply a tag name only to have it resolved again, change
verify_tag() to accept a tag SHA1 rather than a name.
> To avoid breaking
> builtin/verify-tag, we move the refname resolution outside of the
> verify_tag() call.
The reasonably intelligent reader should understand implicitly that
this is a natural consequence of changing the signature of
verify_tag(), thus it's not really necessary to state it explicitly.
(It makes the commit message noisier without adding value.)
More below...
> Signed-off-by: Santiago Torres <santiago@nyu.edu>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/verify-tag.c b/builtin/verify-tag.c
> @@ -42,25 +42,23 @@ static int run_gpg_verify(const char *buf, unsigned long size, unsigned flags)
> -static int verify_tag(const char *name, unsigned flags)
> +static int verify_tag(const unsigned char *sha1, unsigned flags)
> {
> enum object_type type;
> - unsigned char sha1[20];
> char *buf;
> + char *hex_sha1;
> unsigned long size;
> int ret;
>
> - if (get_sha1(name, sha1))
> - return error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
> -
> + hex_sha1 = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
> type = sha1_object_info(sha1, NULL);
> if (type != OBJ_TAG)
> return error("%s: cannot verify a non-tag object of type %s.",
> - name, typename(type));
> + hex_sha1, typename(type));
>
> buf = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size);
> if (!buf)
> - return error("%s: unable to read file.", name);
> + return error("%s: unable to read file.", hex_sha1);
Nit: sha1_to_hex() gets invoked *always*, even when there is no error.
An alternative would be to call it within each error() invocation,
when it's actually needed.
return error("%s: unable to read file.", sha1_to_hex(sha1));
> @@ -96,8 +96,15 @@ int cmd_verify_tag(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> - while (i < argc)
> - if (verify_tag(argv[i++], flags))
> + while (i < argc) {
> + name = argv[i++];
> + if (get_sha1(name, sha1)) {
> + error("tag '%s' not found.", name);
> had_error = 1;
> + continue;
> + }
> + if (verify_tag(sha1, flags))
> + had_error = 1;
An alternative without 'continue':
if (get_sha1(...)) {
error("tag ...");
had_error = 1;
} else if (verify_tag(...))
had_error = 1;
I don't feel strongly about it, and it's certainly not worth a re-roll.
> + }
> return had_error;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-05 16:07 [PATCH v5 0/6] tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] builtin/verify-tag.c: Ignore SIGPIPE on gpg-interface santiago
2016-04-06 16:43 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] t7030-verify-tag: Adds validation for multiple tags santiago
2016-04-06 6:21 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 17:31 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 18:38 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:53 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-06 16:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] builtin/verify-tag: change variable name for readability santiago
2016-04-06 16:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] builtin/verify-tag: replace name argument with sha1 santiago
2016-04-06 6:56 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2016-04-06 16:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-07 3:38 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] builtin/verify-tag: move verification code to tag.c santiago
2016-04-06 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-05 16:07 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] tag: use gpg_verify_function in tag -v call santiago
2016-04-06 7:09 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-05 16:44 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] tag: move PGP verification code to tag.c Santiago Torres
2016-04-06 7:18 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-07 3:40 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-07 16:19 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-17 17:34 ` Santiago Torres
2016-04-17 18:14 ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-06 16:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-07 3:33 ` Santiago Torres
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPig+cQ_R+YJVAsDDDPBHRZ=Un=34kum096YeFrGOo3_pU-g3A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=santiago@nyu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).