From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302821F6AC for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2018 09:38:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932758AbeGDJiw (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:38:52 -0400 Received: from mail-yb0-f195.google.com ([209.85.213.195]:37736 "EHLO mail-yb0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932652AbeGDJin (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:38:43 -0400 Received: by mail-yb0-f195.google.com with SMTP id r3-v6so1857060ybo.4 for ; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 02:38:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0gHd8lTtP7woNtMYbHAocrA84/sTBZL2Leuq+GNH8wA=; b=J+jKUThgVe79p97k05fmQsuHig0czROoTnmG5qkqXcMXYxk/yO9U18fUuSa7KqBcC0 Y2MRDTMqnVrgpVj+0vi7TQNVh0VW9GZRp7tlj7cFLZ5yBsHTQYYNgdfcF0fGkDnqw1Yn 1GbgLT59qxSMgmy2VFrghcsmoXxz6rYdzxWzQgXFmxhcB9I/Tt4ExsN23IlP5AjrsweJ 07nOJsLUHgyq5gLvQLnYcX6GIq8I8cYj/NqghQNigD+CuDjvYZF1R241VQXnNKGtWa9j BXUChBVLlRPyt85aN6fMNxTky0fosugEIc5jU/Nz6ZQGwl2JLKCGH4jeiL5Ok0bRToTA e6KA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0xdVHeLAWkXFcQEgc5Sgbj3N+ieyvPa5c017c2A1MtleA9itoE so8W2qqo0bZE7W8ng6UqkzrO+Io9JmUyWiL4BLs= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpceoX5KgNOxHbqQJRpPz9IA9q/IbuNLTtUUtdtIM95DO6biIDfNNM3HenzpRBdyCl095a9Cvtv9YywzpbrAgEE= X-Received: by 2002:a5b:601:: with SMTP id d1-v6mr559456ybq.295.1530697123217; Wed, 04 Jul 2018 02:38:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <26b538bd-df59-d9a6-460d-0b1042b35250@gmail.com> <20180703235337.31770-1-jyn514@gmail.com> <368608dc-4351-541c-0236-9f5760ca5d97@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <368608dc-4351-541c-0236-9f5760ca5d97@gmail.com> From: Eric Sunshine Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2018 05:38:32 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] ls-tree: make optional To: jyn514@gmail.com Cc: Git List Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 8:05 PM Joshua Nelson wrote: > Is it customary to send a new patch or second patch that builds on the > first? It depends what you mean. If there were problems with a version of a patch you sent, then you "re-roll", which means you re-send the patch in its entirety as if it's brand new (not building on the problematic previous version). You'd also indicate the attempt number in the subject; for instance "[PATCH v2]" for the second attempt. If you're working on some functionality that is built up over a series steps, then you would send all those patches as a "patch series", in which each patch in the series builds upon the patch or patches preceding it in the series. > If I specify a commit range to git-send-email it sends both, not > just the latest. I'm not quite sure what you mean.