Re: [PATCH 8/9] refs: implement logic to migrate between ref storage formats

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 3:35 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 01:31:03PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 4:26 AM Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> wrote:
> > > In other words, this version is a minimum viable product for migrating a
> > > repository's ref storage format. It works alright for bare repos, which
> > > typically have neither worktrees nor reflogs.
> >
> > Worktrees hanging off a bare repository is an explicitly supported
> > use-case, and there are people who use and promote such an
> > organization, so I'm not sure if "typically" is accurate these days.
> > Anyhow, just a minor observation, probably not worth rewording, and
> > certainly not worth a reroll.
>
> True enough. I would claim that most bare repositories out in the wild
> do not have worktrees, mostly because they are used on the server side.
> But in the end, quantity is rather irrelevant. I'll s/typically/often/
> to relax the statement a bit. Does that work for you?

Yes, "often" works just fine.