From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Johannes Postler <johannes.postler@txture.io>,
Git List <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] format-patch: refactor output selection
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 12:01:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cRG4uPL1TDpEOgOZwSEJfyt-d0XmsVz3hcCebgwbO_v_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201104132522.GA3030146@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 8:25 AM Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:
> The --stdout and --output-directory options are mutually exclusive, but
> it's hard to tell from reading the code. We have three separate
> conditionals that check for use_stdout, and it's only after we've set up
> the output_directory fully that we check whether the user also specified
> --stdout.
>
> Instead, let's check the exclusion explicitly first, then have a single
> conditional that handles stdout versus an output directory. This is
> slightly easier to follow now, and also will keep things sane when we
> add another output mode in a future patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/log.c b/builtin/log.c
> @@ -1942,20 +1942,20 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
> + if (use_stdout + !!output_directory > 1)
> + die(_("specify only one of --stdout, --output, and --output-directory"));
Is mention of --output intentional here? The commit message only talks
about --stdout and --output-directory.
It's subjective, but "mutually exclusive" sounds a bit more consistent
with other similar error messages elsewhere:
--stdout, --output, and --output-directory are mutually exclusive
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-04 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-04 10:18 [Bug report] Crash when creating patch Johannes Postler
2020-11-04 13:24 ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 13:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] format-patch: refactor output selection Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:01 ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2020-11-04 17:13 ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 13:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:03 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 13:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] format-patch: support --output option Jeff King
2020-11-04 17:27 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 19:15 ` Jeff King
2020-11-04 20:16 ` Eric Sunshine
2020-11-04 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-11-04 19:26 ` [PATCH v2] format-patch --output Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] format-patch: refactor output selection Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] format-patch: tie file-opening logic to output_directory Jeff King
2020-11-04 19:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] format-patch: support --output option Jeff King
2020-11-05 6:30 ` [PATCH v2] format-patch --output Johannes Postler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAPig+cRG4uPL1TDpEOgOZwSEJfyt-d0XmsVz3hcCebgwbO_v_A@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johannes.postler@txture.io \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).