Re: [PATCH] doc: use "git switch -c" rather than "git checkout -b" consistently

[Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>]

On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 2:58 PM <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
> On January 9, 2023 2:17 PM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 6:20 AM <rsbecker@nexbridge.com> wrote:
> >> git switch is still marked as EXPERIMENTAL in the online help. I don't
> >> think moving broadly to switch from checkout in the documentation
> >> should happen until the EXPERIMENTAL designation is dropped. After that, then
> >"switch -c"
> >> should be used everywhere instead of checkout (except for in the
> >> checkout documentation).
> >
> >Such a point probably should have been raised when 328c6cb853 (doc:
> >promote "git switch", 2019-03-29) was submitted, but since 328c6cb853 was
> >merged nearly four years ago and has been pointing people at git-switch all this
> >time, it's probably too late to use it as an argument now.
>
> I agree. Perhaps it is time to drop the "EXPERIMENTAL" notices from 'git switch', in that case.

Perhaps. Perhaps not. As I recall, both Felipe and Ævar expressed
rather serious concerns that git-switch is not yet ready as a proper
git-checkout replacement. Samples of their concerns can be found at
[1] and [2], for instance.

By the way, git-worktree is even older and probably more widely used
than git-switch, yet it is still marked "experimental", as well, and
perhaps rightly so. As far as I understand, for instance, it still
isn't compatible with submodules (though there may have been some
recent work from one of the Googlers in that area?).

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/211021.86wnm6l1ip.gmgdl@evledraar.gmail.com/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/CAPiPmQnb=XMaF2+YkryEbiX8zA=jwa5y=fbAGk9jpCExpbS4Rw@mail.gmail.com/T/