git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>
To: "René Scharfe" <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>
Cc: git discussion list <git@vger.kernel.org>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>,
	BJ Hargrave <bj@bjhargrave.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive
Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 14:21:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPig+cTidjz4D1vZ7Aci4YZK8ph9HJ1vMqZ1-n2hVPbLuf4AKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518BA10B.2080003@lsrfire.ath.cx>

On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 9:13 AM, René Scharfe
<rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> wrote:
> Test 2 of t5004 checks if a supposedly empty tar archive really
> contains no files.  24676f02 (t5004: fix issue with empty archive test
> and bsdtar) removed our commit hash to make it work with bsdtar, but
> the test still fails on NetBSD and OpenBSD, which use their own tar
> that considers a tar file containing only NULs as broken.
>
> Here's what the different archivers do when asked to create a tar
> file without entries:
>
>         $ uname -v
>         NetBSD 6.0.1 (GENERIC)
>         $ gtar --version | head -1
>         tar (GNU tar) 1.26
>         $ bsdtar --version
>         bsdtar 2.8.4 - libarchive 2.8.4
>
>         $ : >zero.tar
>         $ perl -e 'print "\0" x 10240' >tenk.tar
>         $ sha1 zero.tar tenk.tar
>         SHA1 (zero.tar) = da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
>         SHA1 (tenk.tar) = 34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
>
>         $ : | tar cf - -T - | sha1
>         da39a3ee5e6b4b0d3255bfef95601890afd80709
>         $ : | gtar cf - -T - | sha1
>         34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
>         $ : | bsdtar cf - -T - | sha1
>         34e163be8e43c5631d8b92e9c43ab0bf0fa62b9c
>
> So NetBSD's native tar creates an empty file, while GNU tar and bsdtar
> both give us 10KB of NULs -- just like git archive with an empty tree.
> Now let's see how the archivers handle these two kinds of empty tar
> files:
>
>         $ tar tf zero.tar; echo $?
>         tar: Unexpected EOF on archive file
>         1
>         $ gtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
>         gtar: This does not look like a tar archive
>         gtar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors
>         2
>         $ bsdtar tf zero.tar; echo $?
>         0
>
>         $ tar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
>         tar: Cannot identify format. Searching...
>         tar: End of archive volume 1 reached
>         tar: Sorry, unable to determine archive format.

Missing "echo $?" output.

>         $ gtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
>         0
>         $ bsdtar tf tenk.tar; echo $?
>         0
>
> NetBSD's tar complains about both, bsdtar happily accepts any of them
> and GNU tar doesn't like zero-length archive files.  So the safest
> course of action is to stay with our block-of-NULs format which is
> compatible with GNU tar and bsdtar, as we can't make NetBSD's native
> tar happy anyway.
>
> We can simplify our test, however, by taking tar out of the picture.
> Instead of extracting the archive and checking for the non-presence of
> files, check if the file has a size of 10KB and contains only NULs.
> This makes t5004 pass on NetBSD and OpenBSD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-09 18:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-09 13:10 [PATCH 1/2] t5004: ignore pax global header file René Scharfe
2013-05-09 13:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive René Scharfe
2013-05-09 13:36   ` [PATCH 3/2] t5004: resurrect original empty tar archive test René Scharfe
2013-05-11  6:03     ` Jonathan Nieder
2013-05-09 18:21   ` Eric Sunshine [this message]
2013-05-09 19:12     ` [PATCH 2/2] t5004: avoid using tar for checking emptiness of archive René Scharfe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAPig+cTidjz4D1vZ7Aci4YZK8ph9HJ1vMqZ1-n2hVPbLuf4AKw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    --cc=bj@bjhargrave.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).