From: Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone@fb.com>
To: "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com>,
"Carlos Martín Nieto" <cmn@elego.de>,
"Tomas Carnecky" <tom@dbservice.com>,
"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: "git@vger.kernel.org" <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Debugging git-commit slowness on a large repo
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:15:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CB0BCE02.2CD42%joshua.redstone@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CB069308.2C9DD%joshua.redstone@fb.com>
Sorry for the poor formatting of the stack trace.
I've written two scripts to reproduce the slow commit behavior that I see.
I've posted both to:
https://gist.github.com/1469760
To repro, first create a dir with lots of files (it defaults to creating 1
million files in 1000 dirs):
$ loadGen.py --baseDir=./bigdir
then, run the simulator scripts to generate and commit a series of small
changes to the repo:
$ git reset --hard HEAD && simulate.py ./bigdir git
The git reset is to clean up any cruft left over from a previous partial
invocation of simulate.py
Note that loadGen.py defaults to creating 1 million files and committing
them in one commit. With a flash drive this took < 30 min, and subsequent
small commits in simulate.py took about 6 seconds. With a hard-drive,
it's taking > 1hr (still waiting for it to finish).
Cheers,
Josh
On 12/8/11 4:17 PM, "Joshua Redstone" <joshua.redstone@fb.com> wrote:
>Btw, I also tried doing some very poor-man's profiling on "git commit"
>without any of the readtree/writetree/updateindex commands.
>
>Around 50% of the time was in (bottom few frames may have varied)
>
>#1 0x00000000004c467e in find_pack_entry (sha1=0x1475a44 ,
>e=0x7fff2621f070) at sha1_file.c:2027
>#2 0x00000000004c57b0 in has_sha1_file (sha1=0x7fe2cd9c7900 "00") at
>sha1_file.c:2567
>
>
>#3 0x000000000046e4af in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:333
>
>
>
>#4 0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285
>
>
>
>#5 0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285
>
>
>
>#6 0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285
>
>
>
>#7 0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285
>
>
>
>#8 0x000000000046e278 in update_one (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=<value optimized out>, base=<value
>optimized out>, baselen=<value optimized out>, missing_ok=<value optimized
>out>, dryrun=0) at cache-\
>tree.c:285
>
>
>
>#9 0x000000000046e869 in cache_tree_update (it=<value optimized out>,
>cache=<value optimized out>, entries=dwarf2_read_address: Corrupted DWARF
>expression.
>
>) at cache-tree.c:379
>
>
>
>#10 0x000000000041cade in prepare_to_commit (index_file=0x781740
>".git/index", prefix=<value optimized out>, current_head=<value optimized
>out>, s=0x7fff26220d00, author_ident=<value optimized out>) at
>builtin/commit.c:866
>#11 0x000000000041d891 in cmd_commit (argc=0, argv=0x7fff262213a0,
>prefix=0x0) at builtin/commit.c:1407
>
>
>#12 0x0000000000404bf7 in handle_internal_command (argc=4,
>argv=0x7fff262213a0) at git.c:308
>
>
>#13 0x0000000000404e2f in main (argc=4, argv=0x7fff262213a0) at git.c:512
>
>
>
>
>
>
>And 30% of the time was in:
>
>#0 0x00000034af2c34a5 in _lxstat () from /lib64/libc.so.6
>
>
>
>#1 0x00000000004abe0f in refresh_cache_ent (istate=0x780940,
>ce=0x7f8462a34e40, options=0, err=0x7fff6dd9f588) at
>/usr/include/sys/stat.h:443
>
>#2 0x00000000004ac1a0 in refresh_index (istate=0x780940, flags=<value
>optimized out>, pathspec=<value optimized out>, seen=<value optimized
>out>, header_msg=0x0) at read-cache.c:1133
>
>#3 0x000000000041b60a in refresh_cache_or_die (refresh_flags=<value
>optimized out>) at builtin/commit.c:331
>
>
>#4 0x000000000041bc39 in prepare_index (argc=0, argv=0x7fff6dda0310,
>prefix=0x0, current_head=<value optimized out>, is_status=<value optimized
>out>) at builtin/commit.c:414
>
>#5 0x000000000041d878 in cmd_commit (argc=0, argv=0x7fff6dda0310,
>prefix=0x0) at builtin/commit.c:1403
>
>
>
>
>
>Josh
>
>
>On 12/8/11 4:09 PM, "Joshua Redstone" <joshua.redstone@fb.com> wrote:
>
>>On 12/7/11 5:39 PM, "Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Joshua Redstone <joshua.redstone@fb.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>> Hi Duy,
>>>> Thanks for the documentation link.
>>>>
>>>> git ls-files shows 100k files, which matches # of files in the working
>>>> tree ('find . -type f -print | wc -l').
>>>
>>>Any chance you can split it into smaller repositories, or remove files
>>>from working directory (e.g. if you store logs, you don't have to keep
>>>logs from all time in working directory, they can be retrieved from
>>>history).
>>
>>It's not really feasible to split it into smaller repositories. In fact,
>>we're expecting it to grow between 3x and 5x in number of files and
>>number
>>of commits.
>>
>>>
>>>> I added a 'git read-tree HEAD' before the git-add, and a 'git
>>>>write-tree'
>>>> after the add. With that, the commit time slowed down to 8 seconds
>>>>per
>>>> commit, plus 4 more seconds for the read-tree/add/write-tree ops. The
>>>> read-tree/add/write-tree each took about a second.
>>>
>>>read-tree destroys stat info in index, refreshing 100k entries in
>>>index in this case may take some time. Try this to see if commit time
>>>reduces and how much time update-index takes
>>>
>>>read-tree HEAD
>>>update-index --refresh
>>>add ....
>>>write-tree
>>>commit -q
>>
>>I added the "update-index --refresh" and the time for commit became more
>>like 0.6 seconds.
>>In this setup: read-tree takes ~2 seconds, update-index takes ~8 seconds,
>>git-add takes 1 to 4 seconds, and write-tree takes less than 1 second.
>>
>>>
>>>> As an experiment, I also tried removing the 'git read-tree' and just
>>>> having the git-write-tree. That sped up commits to 0.6 seconds, but
>>>>the
>>>> overall time for add/write-tree/commit was still 3 to 6 seconds.
>>>
>>>overall time is not really important because we duplicate work here
>>>(write-tree is done as part of commit again). What I'm trying to do is
>>>to determine how much time each operation in commit may take.
>>>--
>>>Duy
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-13 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-02 23:17 Debugging git-commit slowness on a large repo Joshua Redstone
2011-12-03 0:23 ` Carlos Martín Nieto
2011-12-05 17:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-07 1:48 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-07 2:08 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-07 22:48 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-08 1:39 ` Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy
2011-12-09 0:09 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-09 0:17 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-13 0:15 ` Joshua Redstone [this message]
2011-12-20 0:51 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-20 1:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-12-20 1:40 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-20 9:23 ` Thomas Rast
2011-12-20 19:26 ` Joshua Redstone
2011-12-04 13:54 ` Tomas Carnecky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CB0BCE02.2CD42%joshua.redstone@fb.com \
--to=joshua.redstone@fb.com \
--cc=cmn@elego.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=pclouds@gmail.com \
--cc=tom@dbservice.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).