From: "Ghanshyam Thakkar" <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com>
To: "Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>, <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>,
<newren@gmail.com>, <christian.couder@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] setup: clarify TODO comment about ignoring core.bare
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2024 02:28:27 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CZHV4DHG59B1.2KMP4AJW9MHJE@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqsf1bf5ew.fsf@gitster.g>
On Fri Mar 1, 2024 at 12:45 AM IST, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ghanshyam Thakkar <shyamthakkar001@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > /*
> > - * TODO: heed core.bare from config file in templates if no
> > - * command-line override given
> > + * Note: The below line simply checks the presence of worktree (the
> > + * simplification of which is given after the line) and core.bare from
> > + * config file is not taken into account when deciding if the worktree
> > + * should be created or not, even if no command line override given.
> > + * That is intentional. Therefore, if in future we want to heed
> > + * core.bare from config file, we should do it before we create any
> > + * subsequent directories for worktree or repo because until this point
> > + * they should already be created.
> > */
> > is_bare_repository_cfg = prev_bare_repository || !work_tree;
>
> I do not recall the discussion; others may want to discuss if the
> change above is desirable, before I come back to the topic later.
>
> But I see this long comment totally unnecessary and distracting.
>
> > - /* TODO (continued):
> > + /* Note (continued):
> > *
> > - * Unfortunately, the line above is equivalent to
> > + * The line above is equivalent to
> > * is_bare_repository_cfg = !work_tree;
> > - * which ignores the config entirely even if no `--[no-]bare`
> > - * command line option was present.
> > *
> > * To see why, note that before this function, there was this call:
> > * prev_bare_repository = is_bare_repository()
>
> If it can be proven that the assignment can be simplified to lose
> the "prev_bare_repository ||" part, then the above comment can be
> used as part of the proposed log message for a commit that makes
> such a change. There is no reason to leave such a long comment to
> leave the more complex "A || B" expression when it can be simplified
> to "B", no?
I agree. In fact, we can remove the prev_bare_repository variable altogether
as it was used solely for the "A || B" expression. Initially this
function used to be in builtin/init-db.c and shared with
builtin/clone.c. In moving to setup.c, an unnecessary global variable
equivalent to prev_bare_repository was removed and therefore
prev_bare_repository was intruduced to not hinder the future possibility
of intruducing the (core.bare from config) feature which might have been
the global variables partial intent[1]. Therefore, I kept the original
expression.
However, in the same series that this was introduced, it was acknowledged
by Elijah[2] that create_default_files() would possibly be too late to heed
core.bare. And indeed it is, as the directories for the worktree or repo
are already created by this point. Therefore, prev_bare_repository does
not seem to have any usecase with/without supporting core.bare from
config.
[1]:
https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqsf1bf5ew.fsf@gitster.g/T/#m64125dd80d04ae177944434e7092522325b374c9
[2]: 0f7443bdc7 (init-db: document existing bug with core.bare in
template config, 2023-05-16)
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-02 22:07 [GSOC][RFC] Heed core.bare from template config file when no command line override given, as a microproject Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-01-04 10:24 ` Christian Couder
2024-01-04 10:39 ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-01-05 2:11 ` Elijah Newren
2024-01-05 15:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-06 12:07 ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-01-08 17:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-19 1:43 ` Elijah Newren
2024-02-29 13:41 ` [PATCH] setup: clarify TODO comment about ignoring core.bare Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-02-29 19:15 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-29 20:58 ` Ghanshyam Thakkar [this message]
2024-03-04 15:18 ` [PATCH v2] setup: remove unnecessary variable Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-04 18:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-03-04 21:27 ` Ghanshyam Thakkar
2024-03-04 21:53 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CZHV4DHG59B1.2KMP4AJW9MHJE@gmail.com \
--to=shyamthakkar001@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=johannes.schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).