From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wincent Colaiuta Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-stash: alias 'list' to 'ls' and 'clear' to 'rm' Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:06:00 +0100 Message-ID: References: <1202207899-28578-1-git-send-email-tim@stoakes.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com To: Tim Stoakes X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Feb 05 12:08:27 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JMLf6-00007k-4I for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:08:24 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756904AbYBELHu convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:07:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756890AbYBELHu (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:07:50 -0500 Received: from wincent.com ([72.3.236.74]:57626 "EHLO s69819.wincent.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756869AbYBELHt convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:07:49 -0500 Received: from cuzco.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by s69819.wincent.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m15B61La007143; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 05:06:02 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1202207899-28578-1-git-send-email-tim@stoakes.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: El 5/2/2008, a las 11:38, Tim Stoakes escribi=F3: > clear:: > +rm:: > Remove all the stashed states. Note that those states will then > be subject to pruning, and may be difficult or impossible to recover= =2E Isn't "rm" a bit misleading here? Seeing as the clear subcommand =20 really does an "rm -rf". Also, is there any other precedent in the command suite for =20 abbreviating subcommand names in that way (ie. not just by shortening =20 them, but by using alternative names based on filesystem commands)? It = =20 strikes me as a bit inconsistent. Cheers, Wincent