From: Caleb White <cdwhite3@pm.me>
To: rsbecker@nexbridge.com, git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: 'shejialuo' <shejialuo@gmail.com>, 'Junio C Hamano' <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure unique worktree ids across repositories
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:29:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D5Z1X36NVZ28.1FPA05CU9GFRL@pm.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00c501db42b4$ea97e050$bfc7a0f0$@nexbridge.com>
On Fri Nov 29, 2024 at 5:17 PM CST, rsbecker wrote:
> On November 29, 2024 6:14 PM, Caleb White writes:
>>On Fri Nov 29, 2024 at 4:54 PM CST, rsbecker wrote:
>>> General comment on this series: Is there a mechanism of preserving
>>> existing functionality for those of us who have existing scripts that
>>> depend on the existing branch and worktree naming?
>>
>>Existing worktrees will continue to work as they do now. The only change is the
>>worktree id for new worktrees. However, there's not an option to preserve the
>>existing behavior for new worktrees (nor do I think there should be).
>
> I do not agree. Companies that have existing scripts should have some way to
> preserve their investment. Just saying "No more worktrees for you" is not
> really considerate.
How exactly are your scripts depending on the worktree id? There are
very few reasons a script might need to know the worktree id, and
I suspect that there's some confusion here. The worktree name is still
used with the `git worktree` commands, so there no change on that front.
Best,
Caleb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-29 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-29 22:37 [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure unique worktree ids across repositories Caleb White
2024-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] worktree: add worktree with unique suffix Caleb White
2024-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] worktree: rename worktree id during worktree move Caleb White
2024-11-29 22:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] worktree: add id to `worktree list` output Caleb White
2024-11-29 22:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] Ensure unique worktree ids across repositories rsbecker
2024-11-29 23:13 ` Caleb White
2024-11-29 23:17 ` rsbecker
2024-11-29 23:29 ` Caleb White [this message]
2024-11-29 23:44 ` rsbecker
2024-11-30 0:08 ` Caleb White
2024-11-30 0:38 ` rsbecker
2024-11-30 16:08 ` Caleb White
2024-11-30 17:16 ` rsbecker
2024-12-02 2:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-02 11:46 ` shejialuo
2024-12-03 0:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-03 0:56 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-12-03 1:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-03 1:53 ` rsbecker
2024-12-03 2:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-03 3:42 ` Caleb White
2024-12-03 4:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-12-03 5:31 ` Caleb White
2024-12-03 1:24 ` shejialuo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D5Z1X36NVZ28.1FPA05CU9GFRL@pm.me \
--to=cdwhite3@pm.me \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=shejialuo@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).