Re: [PATCH] notes: do not drop notes written by a concurrent process

["Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com>]

On Thu Oct 29, 2026 at 2:42 PM PDT, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Farid Zakaria" <farid.m.zakaria@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> I felt confident reviewing the current patch at it's current state
>> (AI-assisted) and I do concur that it's a net-positive change in the
>> interim.
>
> Sorry, but I find the above very confusing, and I cannot figure out
> who is reviewing whose patch, and who is concuring whose statement
> that said what.

It's because I bottom-posted; I thought it might be easier to read that
way -- I guess not.

I was just trying to say that I felt confident in my comprehension of
this current patch, and agreed with Kristoffer that it's a positive
change as it stands, although the algorithm could be improved to handle
cases with different branches as mentioned.

(hopefully that's a little more concise and clear)