From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=157.230.60.252 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794497165; b=J/bNLYdeLQ9cy6x1mvW9hjELlSn0fUiMheZ1YZjxMyAPhvzg93l9FNghm141eOneAODb LT5huhNSgE319SIzafx+xh+i/Oti55eoMiABTxF7RblVRc7VwzzwvE/+dSjHAhswNxaW1 OTWfG53QhHzCsXKPIBRRypWzwNlKcB/SNUrRBPNGR/ulSY/B+YZc4HPwL8hzNfP/zvoI2 HkP7lwTckUo+ush2Mz4CmwOUINT1YPiYPg8Tlg2eqSyXB+4/E9h+36M14Oq1KMjT78U8m YejL6kZ5ozYqd1fPO5+WNsXcsstnO/5/+QjmxfA1URv8Ge/6s1CiXEFPofCdBZrW4Nw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794497165; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Mime-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:To:From: Subject:Cc:X-Mailer:References:In-Reply-To; bh=nPcqw+KvIVqefkDCn0wH5aGRQxoODU/9z4iVEt+LS90=; b=z2I+AWijrGz0j7hIBX7V4rITc2k30M+V3+jsjY9ymHubNUn2Y24OEmPmFNfjAgLIFIpw +2QKUfzyAvCU6dV3b3u5tb56pa7IDXJgdYBDkKgyDgFM7kSIlP8iKTwtHOAt3OZmlcPnU zLzfSYO68PMKOWLk82dqkVB56XNgp7BwBnhwA+tDwZiS6x1zrTu33x+dncswFKjwD6R3Y LcE1H1JpF+TX6r0XUKctfchoM2H65LzNlEKILXEv6kvq0hlrm+huIPtbHqYOybq3OPqfe iAyQX9JjYLQqUVtdx7Z8OLI8KHe6GbRXv39XMnXGnagDKhIOopKIolnBvdIXdoIQwdw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=lfurio.us; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lfurio.us; dkim=pass header.d=lfurio.us header.i=@lfurio.us header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=FO8BLsPG; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=157.230.60.252 Received: from mail.normalmode.org (h01.normalmode.org [157.230.60.252]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16CD6606A339 for ; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:26:04 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 16CD6606A339 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lfurio.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lfurio.us Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lfurio.us header.i=@lfurio.us header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=default header.b=FO8BLsPG DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=lfurio.us; s=default; t=1794497158; bh=nPcqw+KvIVqefkDCn0wH5aGRQxoODU/9z4iVEt+LS90=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FO8BLsPGMx9QVKpNwvZEMfIVXOTeEDpCNXL7vKLUPupLDoszR7TkZRYhkhkrWBJ65 LWTWxB7qERgriyemgHqloosw90m322CFy9kDkzp1rgI32KZhxrhr0EiCaq0FB/72Qw qOB/Oc6F08M66t+46ckSsjgIoQ/u2UE0GFDDREYg= Received: by mail.normalmode.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 523D6634E5; Thu, 12 Nov 2026 15:25:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 10:25:49 -0500 Message-Id: To: , "Junio C Hamano" From: "Matt Hunter" Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] fetch: avoid fetching every branch of a new remote in a shallow repo Cc: "Harald Nordgren" , "Harald Nordgren via GitGitGadget" , , "D. Ben Knoble" , "Colin Hinton" X-Mailer: aerc 0.21.0-0-g5549850facc2 References: <5566b994-1070-41d3-807b-5fac9ddaa3d8@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5566b994-1070-41d3-807b-5fac9ddaa3d8@gmail.com> On Thu Nov 12, 2026 at 6:16 AM EST, Phillip Wood wrote: > On 11/11/2026 17:37, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> In any case, this topic one is keeping a topic by another author >> waiting to settle, so we have stronger incentive to see it move past >> the finish line. > > What topic is that? - I can't see anything marked as depending on this > in the latest "what's cooking" email. Would merging the first part of > this series unblock the other one? I believe that is ch/remote-defer-follow-remote-head-validation, which doesn't strictly depend on the changes from this topic, but the two have textual conflicts that the other author is deferring to resolve when this one lands. It looks like if this topic were merged up to patch 3/6 (fetch: infer branches to fetch from a refmap-only remote), the situation could resolve.