From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jdl@freescale.com Subject: Re: Should Cogito scripts be renamed? Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:07:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20050915234607.GA10867@pasky.or.cz> X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Sep 16 02:07:47 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EG3lG-0003z0-KK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 16 Sep 2005 02:07:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751218AbVIPAHP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:07:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965279AbVIPAHP (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:07:15 -0400 Received: from colo.jdl.com ([66.118.10.122]:20362 "EHLO jdl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218AbVIPAHO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Sep 2005 20:07:14 -0400 Received: from jdl (helo=jdl.com) by jdl.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EG3ku-0005hU-Eb for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 19:07:05 -0500 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20050915234607.GA10867@pasky.or.cz> X-Spam-Score: -105.9 (---------------------------------------------------) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: So, like, the other day Petr asked: > I'd like to hear the opinion of Cogito users about renaming the Cogito > commands accordingly to the GIT big renames. This would be: > > cg-pull -> cg-fetch > cg-update -> cg-pull It took me a good long while of confusion before I realized that cg and git were inconsistent in their command names and meanings here. It was the source of Head Scratching and Not Understanding. I am firmly of the opinion that CG should either rename these commands to be more consistent with GIT, or else make up totally new, different names unrelated to git entirely. The reuse of "pull" alone will be, IMO, a constant source of documentation and explanation headaches. As with git, sooner rather than later, please. jdl