From: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add bug isolation howto, scraped from Linus.
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 20:45:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1EZJUD-0001yw-Io@jdl.com> (raw)
Signed-off-by: Jon Loeliger <jdl@freescale.com>
---
You know, eventually this will all be fully documented.
The trick is to catch Words To The Wise as the flow past you.
Documentation/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt
applies-to: 71213f57daeac18b52439d6d8acd5baba9bf05c7
4e0819ff782b33d149634a397fb539f4759ef1f4
diff --git a/Documentation/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt b/Documentation/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4009495
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/howto/isolate-bugs-with-bisect.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds () osdl ! org>
+To: git@vger.kernel.org
+Date: 2005-11-08 1:31:34
+Subject: Real-life kernel debugging scenario
+Abstract: Short-n-sweet, Linus tells us how to leverage `git-bisect` to perform
+ bug isolation on a repository where "good" and "bad" revisions are known
+ in order to identify a suspect commit.
+
+
+How To Use git-bisect To Isolate a Bogus Commit
+===============================================
+
+The way to use "git bisect" couldn't be easier.
+
+Figure out what the oldest bad state you know about is (that's usually the
+head of "master", since that's what you just tried to boot and failed at).
+Also, figure out the most recent known-good commit (usually the _previous_
+kernel you ran: and if you've only done a single "pull" in between, it
+will be ORIG_HEAD).
+
+Then do
+
+ git bisect start
+ git bisect bad master <- mark "master" as the bad state
+ git bisect good ORIG_HEAD <- mark ORIG_HEAD as good (or
+ whatever other known-good
+ thing you booted laste)
+
+and at this point "git bisect" will churn for a while, and tell you what
+the mid-point between those two commits are, and check that state out as
+the head of the bew "bisect" branch.
+
+Compile and reboot.
+
+If it's good, just do
+
+ git bisect good <- mark current head as good
+
+otherwise, reboot into a good kernel instead, and do (surprise surprise,
+git really is very intuitive):
+
+ git bisect bad <- mark current head as bad
+
+and whatever you do, git will select a new half-way point. Do this for a
+while, until git tells you exactly which commit was the first bad commit.
+That's your culprit.
+
+It really works wonderfully well, except for the case where there was
+_another_ commit that broke something in between, like introduced some
+stupid compile error. In that case you should not mark that commit good or
+bad: you should try to find another commit close-by, and do a "git reset
+--hard <newcommit>" to try out _that_ commit instead, and then test that
+instead (and mark it good or bad).
+
+You can do "git bisect visualize" while you do all this to see what's
+going on by starting up gitk on the bisection range.
+
+Finally, once you've figured out exactly which commit was bad, you can
+then go back to the master branch, and try reverting just that commit:
+
+ git checkout master
+ git revert <bad-commit-id>
+
+to verify that the top-of-kernel works with that single commit reverted.
+
---
0.99.9.GIT
reply other threads:[~2005-11-08 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1EZJUD-0001yw-Io@jdl.com \
--to=jdl@freescale.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox