From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Loeliger Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add --pretty=fuller Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:42:57 -0600 Message-ID: X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 10 15:43:15 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EaDdy-0007NW-9c for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 15:43:15 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750877AbVKJOnI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750966AbVKJOnI (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:08 -0500 Received: from jdl.com ([66.118.10.122]:54998 "EHLO jdl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877AbVKJOnH (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:43:07 -0500 Received: from jdl (helo=jdl.com) by jdl.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.44) id 1EaDdh-0007qo-E2 for git@vger.kernel.org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:42:58 -0600 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: 43730EBD.90307@op5.se X-Spam-Score: -105.9 (---------------------------------------------------) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andreas wrote: > --show-author=date,timestamp,name > --show-committer=name,time > --show=name,date (for both author and committer) > > or some such, with --pretty= just a short-hand for those > show-options? Which just looks like a candidate for the [log] section of the config file to me. Or is the "git log" output needing to be standardized enough that this level of flexability is a bad idea? Dunno. jdl