From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Verych Subject: (Re: gitweb not friendly to firefox?) and unusable in the lynx Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <989B956029373F45A0B8AF02970818902DA81B@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> <7vabyweypw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Cc: "Li Yang-r58472" , "Jakub Narebski" , , "Raimund Bauer" , To: Junio C Hamano X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Mar 02 17:18:05 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNAS9-00071N-86 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:17:53 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992565AbXCBQRu (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:17:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992571AbXCBQRu (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:17:50 -0500 Received: from raven.upol.cz ([158.194.120.4]:50931 "EHLO raven.upol.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2992565AbXCBQRt (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Mar 2007 11:17:49 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 395 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 11:17:49 EST Received: from smtpgate (antivir1.upol.cz [158.194.108.127]) by raven.upol.cz (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA53090; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 17:18:43 +0100 Received: from flower (flower.upol.cz [158.194.64.22]) by smtpgate ([158.194.108.127]:25) (F-Secure Anti-Virus for Internet Mail 6.50.60 Release) with SMTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 16:09:45 -0000 (envelope-from ) Received: from olecom by flower with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HNATn-0005Y6-HW; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 17:19:35 +0100 In-Reply-To: <7vabyweypw.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > From: Junio C Hamano > Newsgroups: gmane.comp.version-control.git > Subject: Re: gitweb not friendly to firefox? > Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:17:31 -0800 [] > > This is puzzling.... Hallo. Guys, changing content to "application/xhtml+xml" was a bad idea. Here i see FF doesn't working, but i have lynx not working at all :( "text/html" is OK, unless you have shiny modern AJAX sh1t on board... ____