From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: Switching from CVS to GIT Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:12:43 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1192293466.17584.95.camel@homebase.localnet> <1192381040.4908.57.camel@homebase.localnet> <1773C6F0-87BE-4F3C-B68A-171E1F32E242@lrde.epita.fr> <47125F74.9050600@op5.se> <47126957.1020204@op5.se> <20071014221446.GC2776@steel.home> <471448D0.6080200@op5.se> <2EA3BEC9-5B13-44D3-B190-CA77499F642C@zib.de> <4D822762-D344-465E-B77D-90A64D61F5A9@zib.de> <26554F2D-B44D-4691-A696-9B6924E08599@zib.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: prohaska@zib.de, git@vger.kernel.org, robin.rosenberg.lists@dewire.com, barkalow@iabervon.org, raa.lkml@gmail.com, tsuna@lrde.epita.fr, ae@op5.se To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 16 17:13:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iho6U-0007As-EX for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:13:06 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932923AbXJPPMp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:12:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933385AbXJPPMp (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:12:45 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:39616 "EHLO fencepost.gnu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933353AbXJPPMo (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:12:44 -0400 Received: from eliz by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Iho67-0005iX-5W; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:12:43 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Johannes Schindelin on Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:14:19 +0100 (BST)) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:14:19 +0100 (BST) > From: Johannes Schindelin > cc: Git Mailing List , > Robin Rosenberg , > Eli Zaretskii , Daniel Barkalow , > Alex Riesen , tsuna@lrde.epita.fr, > Andreas Ericsson > > So I think this will always be something Windows users would wish to > impose onto others, while Linux users would always refuse. Here is one Windows user that will never try to impose that ;-) However, it's possible that an option could be supported to do that when the user particularly wants that in her database. Just a thought...