From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12438201B0 for ; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 14:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932834AbdBVOfq (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:35:46 -0500 Received: from mylo.jdl.com ([208.123.73.151]:53242 "EHLO mylo.jdl.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932827AbdBVOfk (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:35:40 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2130 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:35:40 EST Received: from jdl (helo=mylo) by mylo.jdl.com with local-esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cgXSe-0007jp-QI; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:00:04 -0600 From: Jon Loeliger To: Junio C Hamano cc: Stefan Beller , Jeff King , Toolforger , "git\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: url..insteadOf vs. submodules In-reply-to: References: <84fcb0bd-85dc-0142-dd58-47a04eaa7c2b@durchholz.org> <20170220090115.6kfzwl62opj4q7k7@sigill.intra.peff.net> <404d109f-e5a7-85a3-e64c-ab1b21c3045d@durchholz.org> <20170220205243.lynnmxouwq7jelld@sigill.intra.peff.net> <28fb85d4-89cd-1f32-3063-2f48d8b935be@durchholz.org> <20170221070653.65ho2anbp55uzjeu@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20170221230029.cs36tjwpsw2opuwp@sigill.intra.peff.net> Comments: In-reply-to Junio C Hamano message dated "Tue, 21 Feb 2017 18:59:06 -0800." Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 08:00:04 -0600 Message-Id: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jdl@jdl.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mylo.jdl.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org So, like, Junio C Hamano said: > Stefan Beller writes: > > > Do we want to invent a special value for url.*.insteadOf to mean > > "look up in superproject, so I don't have to keep > > a copy that may get stale" ? > > My gut feeling is that we should do the selective/filtered include > Peff mentioned when a repository is known to be used as a submodule > of somebody else. Does the management of these submodue-related config values become easier if, instead of placing them in .config, we place them in a git/.context file? jdl