From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Geert Bosch Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc: call "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:55 -0400 Message-ID: References: <7vskywadum.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq5k77z0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v919.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Junio C Hamano , Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 12 17:22:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZThw-00067w-0r for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 17:21:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751284AbYCLQU5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751057AbYCLQU5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:57 -0400 Received: from rock.gnat.com ([205.232.38.15]:50789 "EHLO rock.gnat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751159AbYCLQU4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:56 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB722AA503; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lVMsRHRgEB5A; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from potomac.gnat.com (potomac.gnat.com [205.232.38.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 332A42A993E; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 12:20:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.919.2) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Mar 12, 2008, at 06:57, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > The real question I asked was: is 2 weeks a sensible default? As I > said, > I was almost tempted to reduce it to 3 days. > > Hmm? Two weeks is a sensible default. Many people don't use their SCM every day (really!). Say you'd work on something friday, mess up and go home, it would be quite bad on monday morning to find that gc kicks in and removes some objects you're trying to recover. The only point is to reduce build-up over long periods, so two weeks seems a perfectly fine cut-off.