From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Jason Pyeron" Subject: RE: [OT] List CC etiquette and my brain just do not seem to work Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:25:42 -0400 Organization: PD Inc Message-ID: References: <3ECA2E24768746D78A799ED85F4856CA@black> <20140615164436.GF368384@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> Reply-To: , "brian m. carlson" , "Jason Pyeron" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: , "'brian m. carlson'" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jun 15 19:27:31 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WwEDH-0008L7-95 for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:27:27 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751719AbaFORZi (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:25:38 -0400 Received: from mail.pdinc.us ([67.90.184.27]:47097 "EHLO mail.pdinc.us" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751468AbaFORZh (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400 Received: from black (nsa1.pdinc.us [67.90.184.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id s5FHPVK8005252; Sun, 15 Jun 2014 13:25:31 -0400 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20140615164436.GF368384@vauxhall.crustytoothpaste.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.4913 Thread-Index: Ac+IuR+/xxwsK+AzRPyR4xvqYWNPugABQK6w Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: > -----Original Message----- > From: brian m. carlson [mailto:sandals@crustytoothpaste.net] > Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2014 12:45 > To: git@vger.kernel.org; Jason Pyeron > Subject: Re: [OT] List CC etiquette and my brain just do not > seem to work > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 10:27:21AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > > Why can the list set the reply to the list and if there is a sender > > whos email is not on the list add them to the reply to > header as well. > > https://www.google.com/search?q=reply+to+considered+harmful Nice! "Coddling the Brain-Dead, Penalizing the Conscientious" from the first result http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html That describes me to a tee, although I strongly disagree with their premise of "It Adds Nothing", it subtracts one message from my inbox. Btw, nice email address it is what I needed today. -Jason -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- - - - Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.us - - Principal Consultant 10 West 24th Street #100 - - +1 (443) 269-1555 x333 Baltimore, Maryland 21218 - - - -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- This message is copyright PD Inc, subject to license 20080407P00.