Re: Puzzled by gitk patch representation for merge commits

[Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@uchicago.edu>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN, Size: 1026 bytes --]

Hi Jérôme,

Jerome Lovy wrote:

> I don't understand the graphical scheme that gitk uses when displaying
> patches for merge commits. I would like to be able to explain this to the
> people I'm trying to evangelize to git, because they are also puzzled when
> they try to check with gitk what a merge has done to a given file.
> 
> I can see that at least three graphical hints seem to be involved:
> - font: regular/bold
> - color: red/blue
> (maybe there are more colors when the commit has more than two parents?)
> - column for displaying the '+' or '-'

All of the information is there in the text; the color and font are just
supposed to make it easier to see.  As for the diff text itself, I
didn't remember what it meant myself, so I looked it up.

It seems the diff format shown is that produced by 'git-diff --cc',
which makes a "compact combined diff".  It only shows conflicting
changes.  Each column on the left represents the changes from a
different parent.

Hope that helps,
Jonathan