From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] write-tree performance problems Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <200504191250.10286.mason@suse.com><200504191412.00227.mason@suse.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Chris Mason , git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 20 01:04:16 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DO1kg-00019q-Uh for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 01:03:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261735AbVDSXHh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:07:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261736AbVDSXHh (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:07:37 -0400 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:9416 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261735AbVDSXHe (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:07:34 -0400 Received: from shell0.pdx.osdl.net (fw.osdl.org [65.172.181.6]) by smtp.osdl.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j3JN7Ts4026906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:07:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (shell0.pdx.osdl.net [10.9.0.31]) by shell0.pdx.osdl.net (8.13.1/8.11.6) with ESMTP id j3JN7SGl005601; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 16:07:29 -0700 To: David Lang In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 tests= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63-osdl_revision__1.35__ X-MIMEDefang-Filter: osdl$Revision: 1.109 $ X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.36 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 19 Apr 2005, David Lang wrote: > > if you are useing quilt for locally developed patches I fully agree with > you, but I was thinking of the case where Andrew is receiving independant > patches from lots of people and storing them in quilt for testing, and > then sending them on to you. In this case the patches really are > independant and it may be useful to continue to treat them this way > instead of collapsing them into one 'update from Andrew' feed. If so, he should set up one repository per quilt patch. That would be crazy, but yes, it would allow me to cherry-pick which one(s) I want to merge with. But the fact is, that cherry-picking should happen at quilt-time not at git time. Linus